Egypt retains global lead in frozen strawberry exports in '24    Egypt allocates EGP5bn to support MSMEs, entrepreneurs    EGP starts week flat against the US dollar    Egypt, Mexico explore joint action on environment, sustainability    New expansion projects, public-private partnerships to modernize, localise industry: El-Shimy    Al-Sisi attends high-level African summit to strengthen continental coordination, regional integration    Al-Wazir inaugurates glass factory, lays foundation stone for new appliance plant at Elaraby Group    Egypt, Mexico discuss environmental cooperation, combating desertification    Egypt launches anti-drug awareness campaign for drivers    HDB expands national footprint with 'Acacia' branch in New Cairo    Lavrov warns against anti-Russia alliances in Asia during North Korea visit    Germany faces recruitment hurdles in push to rearm, eyes conscription    Needle-spiking attacks in France prompt government warning, public fear    Foreign, housing ministers discuss Egypt's role in African development push    Egypt's EDA, Haleon discuss local market support    Korea Culture Week in Egypt to blend K-Pop with traditional arts    Egypt, France FMs review Gaza ceasefire efforts, reconstruction    CIB finances Giza Pyramids Sound and Light Show redevelopment with EGP 963m loan    Greco-Roman tombs with hieroglyphic inscriptions discovered in Aswan    Egypt reveals heritage e-training portal    Three ancient rock-cut tombs discovered in Aswan    Egypt condemns deadly terrorist attack in Niger        Sisi launches new support initiative for families of war, terrorism victims    Egypt's GAH, Spain's Konecta discuss digital health partnership    Egypt expands e-ticketing to 110 heritage sites, adds self-service kiosks at Saqqara    Egypt's Irrigation Minister urges scientific cooperation to tackle water scarcity    Palm Hills Squash Open debuts with 48 international stars, $250,000 prize pool    Egypt's Democratic Generation Party Evaluates 84 Candidates Ahead of Parliamentary Vote    On Sport to broadcast Pan Arab Golf Championship for Juniors and Ladies in Egypt    Golf Festival in Cairo to mark Arab Golf Federation's 50th anniversary    Germany among EU's priciest labour markets – official data    Cabinet approves establishment of national medical tourism council to boost healthcare sector    Egypt's PM follows up on Julius Nyerere dam project in Tanzania    Paris Olympic gold '24 medals hit record value    A minute of silence for Egyptian sports    Russia says it's in sync with US, China, Pakistan on Taliban    It's a bit frustrating to draw at home: Real Madrid keeper after Villarreal game    Shoukry reviews with Guterres Egypt's efforts to achieve SDGs, promote human rights    Sudan says countries must cooperate on vaccines    Johnson & Johnson: Second shot boosts antibodies and protection against COVID-19    Egypt to tax bloggers, YouTubers    Egypt's FM asserts importance of stability in Libya, holding elections as scheduled    We mustn't lose touch: Muller after Bayern win in Bundesliga    Egypt records 36 new deaths from Covid-19, highest since mid June    Egypt sells $3 bln US-dollar dominated eurobonds    Gamal Hanafy's ceramic exhibition at Gezira Arts Centre is a must go    Italian Institute Director Davide Scalmani presents activities of the Cairo Institute for ITALIANA.IT platform    







Thank you for reporting!
This image will be automatically disabled when it gets reported by several people.



Sanders is right: Iraq is important
Published in Al-Ahram Weekly on 16 - 02 - 2016

Bernie Sanders has been unfairly criticised for being a “Johnny One Note” on foreign policy because he continually reminds voters of his early opposition to the Iraq war. To explain why he continues to emphasise the importance of his decision to oppose that war, Sanders has pointed to the speech he gave back in October 2002, in which he laid out five important reasons why he feared the Bush administration's march to war.
Critics and cynics have flippantly dismissed his understanding of foreign affairs and have, therefore, ignored this important speech. Because it was so prescient, it deserves attention, not scorn. Here, in short, are the five reasons he gave in 2002 for opposing the Iraq war:
1. The Bush administration provided no “estimates of how many young American men and women might die ... or how many tens of thousands of women and children in Iraq might also be killed”.
2. Then there was the concern “about the precedent that a unilateral invasion of Iraq could establish in terms of international law and the role of the United Nations”.
3. Because the United States was “involved in a very difficult war against international terrorism”, Sanders echoed Brent Scowcroft's concern that “an attack on Iraq ... would seriously jeopardise, if not destroy, the global counter-terrorist campaign”.
4. With the US “facing a $6 trillion national debt and a growing deficit ... a war and long-term American occupation of Iraq could be extremely expensive”.
5. Finally, Sanders expressed his concern for the “unintended consequences” of the war, asking, “Who would govern Iraq [after] Saddam and what role will the US play in the ensuing civil war that could develop?” In reaction to the war, would extremists destabilise other governments in the region and would the “bloody conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Authority be exacerbated?”
To understand the significance of these five points, it is important to recall the false narrative the Bush administration was pitching in advance of the invasion, and what actually happened as a result of the disastrous decision to go to war.
In the lead-up to hostilities, the Bush crowd created an elaborate web of deceit to sell their plans. The biggest lies they told were not those about Saddam's nuclear programme. More disturbing was the rosy picture they painted about how easy it would be and the positive outcomes that would follow.
Defence Department officials assured Congress that the effort would only require a commitment of 60,000 to 90,000 troops. They predicted that the regime could be toppled in six weeks and the war would be won in six months, costing the US a mere one to two billion dollars, with the rest being covered by Iraqi oil revenues. American troops would be greeted by Iraqis as liberators, and “the beacon of freedom would shine bright, lighting up the Middle East”.
What happened, of course, was closer to what Sanders had predicted. After eight bloody years of war and occupation, over 4,600 Americans had died, while the lives of tens of thousands more had been shattered by debilitating injuries and PTSD. One of the more troubling consequences of this war are the 22 veterans who commit suicide every single day, meaning that we lose more young men and women every year to PTSD-induced suicide than we lost during the entire war. The cost of the war, the occupation, and the long-term care of wounded veterans is approaching $3 trillion.
Compounding this tragedy are the hundreds of thousands of Iraqis who were killed in the war and the civil conflict that followed. By dismantling Iraqi institutions and attempting to create from whole cloth a sect-based Iraqi government, the Bush administration stoked latent sectarian tensions that resulted in campaigns of ethnic cleansing and a dysfunctional political order.
Instead of defeating terrorism, the war served to aggravate it, with Al-Qaeda and its successor, Islamic State (IS), spreading to at least 16 countries. At the same time, the war and our behaviours exhibited in the war (Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo) led to a precipitous decline in respect for and support for America across the globe, putting our country at even greater risk.
One final “unintended consequence” of the war was not only the growth of ç, but also the unleashing of an emboldened Iran on the region. With Saddam and the Taliban defeated, Iran was able to expand its influence in Iraq and project its claim to be the leader of the “resistance against the West”.
As Sanders correctly notes, it wasn't just the Bush administration that supported this disastrous war. The Democratic-led Senate passed the resolution that was used to justify the invasion. And so, dear critics and cynics, before suggesting that Sanders lacks the wisdom to conduct foreign policy, pay attention to the judgement and foresight he demonstrated in what he has rightly termed the most critical decision senators were called on to make in this century.
In bringing up his opposition to the war, Sanders is not only distinguishing himself from Hillary Clinton, who supported the invasion, he is also correctly laying the predicate for a more thoughtful, realist-based foreign policy grounded in respect for international law and institutions, cooperation with partners, and diplomatic engagement.
The writer is president of the Arab American Institute.


Clic here to read the story from its source.