Attacks on Saudi oil facilities put energy supply at risk: Pompeo    Neuer considering Germany retirement after Euro 2020    Spain braces for its fourth election in four years    EU warns Britain it is heading for a no-deal Brexit    Danone Nations, DECATHLON launch series of initiatives, creating change    Fed expected to cut rates again, second time in a decade    Live score: Paris Saint-Germain v Real Madrid (UEFA Champions League)    Huawei will invest $1.5 billion in its developer program    Sudanese PM heads to Cairo for talks    I deserve more Ballon d'Or awards than Messi, says Ronaldo    World at risk of pandemics that could kill millions    Mint, menthol e-cigarette liquids high in cancer-causing compound    Perils of gender and geography hamper global development    Saudi markets rise as oil supply disruption eases    How to read Al-Sadr's summit in Iran?    Gold climbs as investors await Fed policy decision    Saudi Arabia says full production restored within the month    'Egypt will not allow any country to impose its will on another in Ethiopian dam issue,' FM says    Egypt's new listing amendments mandate more women on boards    Egypt, Ethiopia at odds as talks over Blue Nile dam resume    5 plant-based soup recipes to warm your body and soul    Egypt's Ahly to train for Super Cup game against Zamalek immediately    US waiting and watching on oil reserve, market well supplied: Perry    FTSE 100 steadies after Saudi attacks; Sirius Minerals plummets    Egypt says GERD talks with Ethiopia 'stumbled', next round in Khartoum in October    Tutankhamun Opera to debut with inauguration of Grand Egyptian Museum: Zahi Hawass    Egyptian transport start-up Swvl plans IPO in 5-10 years    Egypt court sentence 6 to death for joining terrorist group, manufacturing explosives; 8 acquitted    'Al-Daheeh' host Ahmed El-Ghandour shortlisted for IBC's first 'Young Pioneer' award    Egypt's Zamalek suffer surprise 2-1 defeat at Senegal's Generation Foot    Egypt's Sisi discusses education, terrorism at national youth conference    Sisi to open 8th edition of the National Youth Conference Saturday    Spotify buys music production marketplace SoundBetter    Egypt's PM discusses details of Al-Hussein Mosque renovation    Egypt's Baron Empain Palace to be reopen after renovation    Court sentences six to death, 41 to lifetime imprisonment violence related case    Trump says he would release Mideast peace plan after Israeli elections    NBE announces EGP 2.5m prizes for handball youth teams for their world achievements    ACWA Power compares 3 bids to supply production units for Luxor power station    What do you know about gold alloying?    Jennifer Lopez evokes Egyptian outrage post her North Coast performance    Cairo's historic Tahrir square to be renovated – PM    Al-Sisi honours Egypt's scholars on Science Day    IS claims responsibility for suicide bombing killing 63 in Afghan wedding    Political parties gear up for parliamentary, senate, local elections    Unprecedented Glory: Egypt win Men's U-19 World Handball Championship    12th National Egyptian Theatre Festival fuel up public theatre art scene    Ministry of Environment has a plan for "black clouds season"    

Thank you for reporting!
This image will be automatically disabled when it gets reported by several people.

Hassan Al-Banna and the state
Published in Al-Ahram Weekly on 15 - 10 - 2014

In the late 1920s the movement envisaged by Hassan Al-Banna took concrete form with the founding of an Islamist group in Ismailiya. Described as a religious association dedicated to “the promotion of virtue and prevention of vice”, its activities focused on proselytising, promoting the construction of mosques, building schools and campaigning against what it regarded as moral degeneration.
The Muslim Brotherhood claimed to have an “Islamic solution” to all the country's social and economic problems. It joined with the Misr Al-Fatah (Young Egypt) Party in opposing the constitution and parliamentary system. The Quran, they argued, was the only constitution an Islamic nation needed. Islamic nationalism was promoted as an alternative to Egyptian nationalism.

At that time, there were three general trends in religious-political thought: traditionalists, epitomised by Al-Azhar; modernist reformists whose chief exponents were disciples of Mohamed Abduh, and conservative reformists who were followers of Rashid Rida.

Rida had broken away from the modernists to go in a Salafist direction on the grounds that the modernists had taken shelter beneath a Western umbrella. Al-Banna, who was inspired by Rida, argued that the key to salvation lay in bringing Egypt back to Islamic teachings.
Al-Banna's definition of his association's mission makes it clear that the Muslim Brotherhood was always a reactionary organization. It emerged not as a proactive, forward-looking movement but as a reaction to existing circumstances. It was both the product and exemplar of crisis: the crisis of acting after a disaster.

In keeping with his Salafist leanings and opposition to Western values, Al-Banna was a staunch opponent of modern education. In his first speech at the Muslim Brotherhood's mosque in Ismailiya, he claimed that Western-style schools were bid'a, a heretical innovation. They produced people whose minds were poisoned by malignant, atheistic and licentious ideas. Modern education instilled in students Western values. These were secularist and, therefore, sinful.
Al-Banna's chief concern was to promote an Islamic state. Although he had yet to form a fully-fledged concept of the structure or shape of this state, his vision was always connected to the demand for the revival of the caliphate, the “Leader of the Faithful”, as the symbol of Islamic unity. He was aware that this demand was impossible to realise in the short term. It was necessary to wait until such time as God decreed it possible for the Islamic nation to take the practical measures to revive the caliphate.

Al-Banna rejected Egypt's system of government. He opposed parliamentary institutions, political parties and other bodies of democratic government. “Islam is obedience and rule, the Quran and the sword. The two are inseparable,” he declared. To paraphrase, Islam is a creed of faith and Sharia law. But Al-Banna added another dimension to the Muslim Brotherhood doctrine: jihad became an integral part of the organisation's ideology.
Beneath the headline “Our second step, Brothers. Prepare yourselves,” Al-Banna wrote in the first edition of the Muslim Brotherhood magazine Al-Nazir (The Herald): “God restrains through power what he does not restrain with the Quran. He will issue his call to leaders. If they respond He will support them. If they resort to evasion and equivocation we will declare war against every leader, head of a political party or body that does not work for the victory of Islam.”
This leaves no doubt that warfare was considered legitimate in Hassan Al-Banna's system. He explicitly espoused the use of violence against the state. He reiterated the same position in his address to the fifth Muslim Brotherhood convention, where he stressed that Muslim Brothers would use force to settle matters when other means had not served their ends.

Al-Banna's views fly in the face of an entire corpus of political thought, not least the ideas of Locke and Kant who argued that recourse to force to settle disputes would ultimately lead to universal destruction. Disputes, they concluded, must be settled through recourse to the law, to a set of fixed and objective criteria.

The Islam to which the Muslim Brotherhood subscribes accords a central place to the form of government but also emphasises action and guidance in how to act.

“Do you think that the Muslim who is content with our life today and who devotes himself to prayer while leaving the world and politics to the elderly, sinners, intruders and colonisers should be called a Muslim? No, he is not a Muslim,” wrote El Banna. “The essence of Islam is jihad, work, religion and the state.”

But against whom should the jihad be fought? To what end should work be performed? How is religion to be a state? What lines separate the two?

The logical extension of Al-Banna's thought is easy to surmise: Jihad is to be fought against all those who differ. But is this about establishing identity or igniting strife?

Al-Banna had no time for political party plurality or the peaceful rotation of authority. Egypt's only salvation was to dissolve all political parties and create a body that would steer the country in accordance with Quranic strictures. Al-Banna maintained that Muslims had no need to imitate or cling to a Western import such as the political party plurality.

But this begs a crucial question. Is the one-party state the answer, regardless of how noble and pure that party and its leaders are? History has given its reply. The one-party state is authoritarian and tyrannical.

To Al-Banna. religious affiliation was everything. It surpassed bonds of geography, ethnicity, language and the shared characteristics of people living on the same land. The universality of Islam and the brotherhood between Muslims was greater than any national or ethnic/regional affiliation.

As he wrote: “Every Muslim believes that every inch of land on which resides a brother who believes in the faith of the Holy Quran is part of the general Islamic territory all the inhabitants of which are obliged by Islam to work to protect it.”
One conclusion that can be drawn is that the Muslim Brother has no objection to relinquishing a portion of his country's territory to benefit brother Muslims who do not belong to the same nation! After all, Al-Banna's perception of nationhood superseded all natural and legal components of the state and swept away any notion of national boundaries.
The writer is a researcher at Al-Ahram Centre for Political and Strategic Studies.

Clic here to read the story from its source.