Egypt condemns Israeli strikes on Lebanon, Syria    Egypt signs strategic agreements to attract global investment in gold, mineral exploration    Egypt launches first national workshop on food systems, climate action with UN, global partners    Al-Sisi reviews Egypt's food security, strategic commodity reserves    Syria says it will defend its territory after Israeli strikes in Suwayda    Egypt urges EU support for Gaza ceasefire, reconstruction at Brussels talks    Pakistan names Qatari royal as brand ambassador after 'Killer Mountain' climb    Health Ministry denies claims of meningitis-related deaths among siblings    Egypt's gold prices grow on July 13th    Sri Lanka's expat remittances up in June '25    CBE's Abdalla attends Arab central bank governors' meeting ahead of Sept summit    Egypt's Health Min. discusses drug localisation with Sandoz    Egypt, Mexico explore joint action on environment, sustainability    Egypt, Mexico discuss environmental cooperation, combating desertification    Needle-spiking attacks in France prompt government warning, public fear    Foreign, housing ministers discuss Egypt's role in African development push    Korea Culture Week in Egypt to blend K-Pop with traditional arts    Egypt, France FMs review Gaza ceasefire efforts, reconstruction    CIB finances Giza Pyramids Sound and Light Show redevelopment with EGP 963m loan    Egypt's PM urges BRICS to prioritise peace    Greco-Roman tombs with hieroglyphic inscriptions discovered in Aswan    Egypt reveals heritage e-training portal    Three ancient rock-cut tombs discovered in Aswan    Sisi launches new support initiative for families of war, terrorism victims    Egypt's GAH, Spain's Konecta discuss digital health partnership    Egypt expands e-ticketing to 110 heritage sites, adds self-service kiosks at Saqqara    Egypt's Irrigation Minister urges scientific cooperation to tackle water scarcity    Palm Hills Squash Open debuts with 48 international stars, $250,000 prize pool    Egypt's Democratic Generation Party Evaluates 84 Candidates Ahead of Parliamentary Vote    On Sport to broadcast Pan Arab Golf Championship for Juniors and Ladies in Egypt    Golf Festival in Cairo to mark Arab Golf Federation's 50th anniversary    Germany among EU's priciest labour markets – official data    Cabinet approves establishment of national medical tourism council to boost healthcare sector    Egypt's PM follows up on Julius Nyerere dam project in Tanzania    Paris Olympic gold '24 medals hit record value    A minute of silence for Egyptian sports    Russia says it's in sync with US, China, Pakistan on Taliban    It's a bit frustrating to draw at home: Real Madrid keeper after Villarreal game    Shoukry reviews with Guterres Egypt's efforts to achieve SDGs, promote human rights    Sudan says countries must cooperate on vaccines    Johnson & Johnson: Second shot boosts antibodies and protection against COVID-19    Egypt to tax bloggers, YouTubers    Egypt's FM asserts importance of stability in Libya, holding elections as scheduled    We mustn't lose touch: Muller after Bayern win in Bundesliga    Egypt records 36 new deaths from Covid-19, highest since mid June    Egypt sells $3 bln US-dollar dominated eurobonds    Gamal Hanafy's ceramic exhibition at Gezira Arts Centre is a must go    Italian Institute Director Davide Scalmani presents activities of the Cairo Institute for ITALIANA.IT platform    







Thank you for reporting!
This image will be automatically disabled when it gets reported by several people.



All sorts of interventions
Published in Daily News Egypt on 03 - 04 - 2011

The focal point of the Arab Spring has shifted from the successful uprisings of Tunisia and Egypt to the bleak developments in Bahrain and Libya. As the military forces of Britain, France and the United States take "all necessary measures" to topple Muammar Gaddafi's regime in Libya, troops from the Gulf Cooperation Council Peninsula Shield Force continue to "stabilize" Isa ibn Salman Al-Khalifa's regime in the face of a peaceful democratic uprising in Bahrain.
The discrepancies between intervention for regime stability in Bahrain and that of regime change in Libya are undergirded by the fact that the interveners in both cases are ultimately one and the same. The GCC and Arab League member states that dispatched their troops to shore up the monarchy in Bahrain are the very same states that endorsed and offered to participate in a military campaign against the jamahiriyyah in Libya. Similarly, the western powers that cited the "responsibility to protect" principle as justification for intervening in Libya are the very same states that called for "restraint" in Bahrain.
In both cases — notwithstanding differences in the contexts and natures of the uprisings — authoritarian regimes are brutally attacking civilians through lethal force as well as arrests, detentions, and disappearances. In both cases — notwithstanding the difference in the purported justifications and natures of each intervention — the logic underlying the actions of western and Arab powers is one and the same.
When external powers intervene to prop up a regime and put down popular democratic demands by force, little needs to be said to convey the problem. But when the same powers intervene to topple a different authoritarian regime, we should not fail to appreciate the dangers of intervention. Many have convincingly argued that references to the historical legacies of colonialism and authoritarianism along with contemporary hypocrisies of fig leafs of accountability cannot alone justify failure to intervene in Libya. Indeed, to do so would simply advance ideological agendas at the expense of real possibilities for preventing a massacre or enabling a peaceful uprising-turned-armed-revolt to succeed.
Western and Arab powers have for some time been intervening in Bahrain and Libya. Thus, what is at stake here is not the question of intervening but rather one of changing the nature of ongoing interventions. In Bahrain, this has taken the form of arming and legitimating Al-Khalifa's rule primarily for energy and geostrategic interests. In Libya, intervention has taken the form of bringing back into the fold the Gaddafi regime primarily for energy and immigration interests. To mark the US/EU-sanctioned entrance of GCC troops into Bahrain or the GCC/Arab League-sanctioned aerial assault on Gaddafi's forces as the starting point of intervention is to render invisible the myriad ways in which the authoritarian regimes of Bahrain and Libya were incorporated — albeit differently — into local and regional strategies of western and Arab powers. Thus, any inquiry into what is to be done at this particular juncture cannot simply start with the present. To do so — as did many who wanted to justify the continuation of the US occupation in Iraq due to the real threat of civil war — is to ignore some of the most important reasons why we find ourselves in this situation in the first place. External interveners will always act according to the logic of their own interests and there is no reason to assume an alignment between that logic and the interests of the people on the ground. Thus it is not only that the intervention in Bahrain points to a contradiction in principle and practice. It is also that such action points to the need to question the assumption that the current intervention in Libya is de facto in the interest of the Libyan people.
The choice that those of us wanting to act in solidarity with the people of Libya face is not a dichotomy between doing nothing (while leaving the Libyan people to their own fate) and doing something (while deferring to powerful external actors to determine what that something is). To call for direct intervention into Libya should not have been equated with providing a carte blanche to western and Arab powers. We should have discussed any and all possible forms of intervention. But we also should have only advocated types of intervention that were identified by a detailed cost-benefit analysis exclusively rooted in the needs and aspirations of the Libyan people. Instead, a broad set of tactics with no clear strategy has been authorized and taken up by powerful external actors. Bahrain — not to mention Afghanistan and Iraq — offers more than just a contradictory example of how western and Arab powers conduct themselves. More importantly, it cautions against surrendering our responsibility of solidarity to the very powers that we are in solidarity against.
Current developments in both Bahrain and Libya are forms of intervention that take control away from local actors. However, there is a difference: those of us in solidarity with the Bahraini people had little explicit say in substituting local agency; in Libya, those of us in solidarity facilitated the taking away of control from local actors. This is the case not because of intentions but because we did not struggle with the nuances of our call to action in Libya nor with the limitations on holding accountable those that we empowered to act.
Now, the decision-makers of the course of events in both Bahrain and Libya are outsiders, repressing democratic calls in one instance and visiting untold potential damage on a whole country in another. I fear for the peoples of Bahrain and Libya in the face of authoritarian violence. I also fear for them in the face of western and Arab intervention. History has shown both to be catastrophic for the humanitarian wellbeing and the political aspirations of the people of the region.
Ziad Abu-Rish is a doctoral candidate in the Department of History at UCLA. He is also co-editor of Jadaliyya Ezine. This commentary is published by DAILY NEWS EGYPT in collaboration with bitterlemons-international.org


Clic here to read the story from its source.