ISTANBUL: The trip to Turkey by US President Barack Hussein Obama, as people loved to emphasize here, was a big success. Except for a few hundred "anti-imperialist , lefty protestors who hit the streets chanting, "Yankee go home , most Turks welcomed him calmly and some even fondly. Some nationalists, including Nationalist Action Party, or MHP, leader Devlet Bahçeli, didn't like what he said about Turkish-Armenian relations - or rather, the lack thereof. But that's quite normal. The Armenian lobby in the United States, which is no fan of Turkey, didn't like the way he handled that issue either. The disapproval of extremists on both sides of a question is often the indicator of a fair position. Personally speaking, I very much liked Obama's messages. The steps he suggested that Turkey take were completely reasonable. Of course, we need to introduce further reforms to honor the rights of our Kurdish citizens and religious minorities. To be sure, the Halki Seminary - the main school of theology of the Eastern Orthodox Church's Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople - unwisely closed by the Turkish authorities in 1971, needs to be reopened. This is all Democracy 101. Democracy 102, if you will, was hidden in Obama's semantics. In the speech he delivered at the Turkish Parliament, for example, he used a term that we Turks should well note: "secular democracy . This came as he was speaking about the heritage of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, the country's founder. "His greatest legacy is Turkey's strong and secular democracy , Obama said. "And that is the work that this assembly carries on today. While it may not seem like rocket science, that formulation is actually quite brilliant. Because the term, "secular democracy is not common in Turkey's political language. We generally, rather, use two different terms: "Secular republic (laik cumhuriyet) and "democracy (demokrasi). And these two are sometimes seen as alternatives to each other. Military coups are made, and justified, in the name of the secular republic. And democracy is often loathed by the latter's zealous defenders as a counter-revolution to theirs. But what is good in a secular republic if is not democratic? The Soviet Union, for example, was a secular republic, but it really was not the place you would want to live in if you have an aspiration for things like civil liberties. The same can be said for North Korea, Red China or Saddam's Iraq. They all had official ideologies (Kim Il Sungism, Maoism and Baathism, respectively) that were as secular as they could be. And they all defined themselves as republics. Are you impressed? What is much better, of course, is to have a democratic ideal, not an official ideology, as the basis of a state. And secularity is only meaningful if it serves this democratic ideal. What secularity does in that context is to save the state, and thus the society, from the dominance of a religious doctrine. But if secularity becomes a doctrine in itself, which aims at suppressing or manipulating religion, then it becomes a threat to the democratic ideal. That is exactly what has happened in Turkey, and that's why we Turks need to re-understand secularity (laiklik, as we call it) in a democratic, not autocratic, way. Obama's speech not only included a semantic eye-opener in this respect, it also implied that Turkey's secular state does not have to clash with, and should not blind us from, the Muslim identity of a large portion of its people. Nine times in his speech he referred to Islam and Muslims. And he sent messages to not only the Turks but also the whole Muslim world: "The United States is not, and will never be , he said, "at war with Islam. There is a reason why he said that not in London or Prague, but in Ankara. The American president also disagreed with those fear-mongering pundits who constantly pump out the idea that Turkey is "turning its face to the East under its current government. "I know there are those who like to debate Turkey's future , Obama noted. "They wonder whether you will be pulled in one direction or another. And he explained why they were wrong: "Here is what they don't understand: Turkey's greatness lies in your ability to be at the centre of things. This is not where East and West divide - it is where they come together. In the beauty of your culture. In the richness of your history. In the strength of your democracy. Absolutely. The mistake of those "debaters is to force Turkey to fit into a single identity that they pick and choose. They tend to define it only as a Western ally, a NATO member and a secular republic. This is all true, and very good, but there is more. Turkey is also the heir of the Ottoman Empire, a leading member of the family of predominantly Muslim nations and the testing ground for the synthesis of Islam and democracy. That is what makes her special. That is what gives her a meaning that goes way beyond its borders. Obviously the American president gets that right. Perhaps it is time for Turks to get it too. Mustafa Akyolis a writer and columnist based in Istanbul. This article is distributed by the Common Ground News Service (CGNews) with permission from the author. This commentary was first published in Hürriyet Daily News, www.hurriyet.com.tr/english.
