From the blog by Mostafa Sheshtawy: The british news paper has wrote a provocative editorial called “Egypt : Tug of War“. A piece that tries to be unbiased that it's missing the whole point of what's going on for weeks now. They start of saying what the whole crisis is “NOT" about, they mentioned it's not about the decree, nor the constitution, but it's about Morsy him self. Stating that the “Opposition" is trying to claim power. hmm, seriously? that same opposition that gave its blessing to Morsy in the second round of elections and most of them voted for him? The “prestigious" Guardian talks about two side, opposition and power, as figures! which is an idiotic domain since the opposition doesn't really matter or even has a significant role in this crisis. People took down the street and Tahrir square again, even before any of the “opposition" declare it's stands. El Baradie met with Morsy few weeks before he announced his “absolute power" decree. I'm sure El Baradie mentioned his aim for the chair! it's outrageous how the Guardian analyze the situation, mentioning that “Muslim Brotherhood‘s Freedome and Justice party sanctioned a violent assault on a peaceful encampment of ‘opposition supporters' outside the presidential palace," then saying “Islamists were its principle victims." So FJP assaulted but Islamists were the victims! How the use of two different words, to portray two different category of people! No they are not, FJP assaulted peaceful protesters (Not opposition supporters! You wont see El Baradie's poster in the crowd for example), so how in the hell would an attacker become a victim? ridiculous! Read the rest here on site ** Please note that this is published exactly as is and has not been edited or changed in any form by Bikyamasr.com
