Front Page
Politics
Economy
International
Sports
Society
Culture
Videos
Newspapers
Ahram Online
Al-Ahram Weekly
Albawaba
Almasry Alyoum
Amwal Al Ghad
Arab News Agency
Bikya Masr
Daily News Egypt
FilGoal
The Egyptian Gazette
Youm7
Subject
Author
Region
f
t
مصرس
Mexico's inflation exceeds expectations in 1st half of April
Egypt's gold prices slightly down on Wednesday
Tesla to incur $350m in layoff expenses in Q2
GAFI empowers entrepreneurs, startups in collaboration with African Development Bank
Egyptian exporters advocate for two-year tax exemption
Egyptian Prime Minister follows up on efforts to increase strategic reserves of essential commodities
Italy hits Amazon with a €10m fine over anti-competitive practices
Environment Ministry, Haretna Foundation sign protocol for sustainable development
After 200 days of war, our resolve stands unyielding, akin to might of mountains: Abu Ubaida
World Bank pauses $150m funding for Tanzanian tourism project
China's '40 coal cutback falls short, threatens climate
Swiss freeze on Russian assets dwindles to $6.36b in '23
Amir Karara reflects on 'Beit Al-Rifai' success, aspires for future collaborations
Ministers of Health, Education launch 'Partnership for Healthy Cities' initiative in schools
Egyptian President and Spanish PM discuss Middle East tensions, bilateral relations in phone call
Amstone Egypt unveils groundbreaking "Hydra B5" Patrol Boat, bolstering domestic defence production
Climate change risks 70% of global workforce – ILO
Health Ministry, EADP establish cooperation protocol for African initiatives
Prime Minister Madbouly reviews cooperation with South Sudan
Ramses II statue head returns to Egypt after repatriation from Switzerland
Egypt retains top spot in CFA's MENA Research Challenge
Egyptian public, private sectors off on Apr 25 marking Sinai Liberation
EU pledges €3.5b for oceans, environment
Egypt forms supreme committee to revive historic Ahl Al-Bayt Trail
Debt swaps could unlock $100b for climate action
Acts of goodness: Transforming companies, people, communities
President Al-Sisi embarks on new term with pledge for prosperity, democratic evolution
Amal Al Ghad Magazine congratulates President Sisi on new office term
Egypt starts construction of groundwater drinking water stations in South Sudan
Egyptian, Japanese Judo communities celebrate new coach at Tokyo's Embassy in Cairo
Uppingham Cairo and Rafa Nadal Academy Unite to Elevate Sports Education in Egypt with the Introduction of the "Rafa Nadal Tennis Program"
Financial literacy becomes extremely important – EGX official
Euro area annual inflation up to 2.9% – Eurostat
BYD، Brazil's Sigma Lithium JV likely
UNESCO celebrates World Arabic Language Day
Motaz Azaiza mural in Manchester tribute to Palestinian journalists
Russia says it's in sync with US, China, Pakistan on Taliban
It's a bit frustrating to draw at home: Real Madrid keeper after Villarreal game
Shoukry reviews with Guterres Egypt's efforts to achieve SDGs, promote human rights
Sudan says countries must cooperate on vaccines
Johnson & Johnson: Second shot boosts antibodies and protection against COVID-19
Egypt to tax bloggers, YouTubers
Egypt's FM asserts importance of stability in Libya, holding elections as scheduled
We mustn't lose touch: Muller after Bayern win in Bundesliga
Egypt records 36 new deaths from Covid-19, highest since mid June
Egypt sells $3 bln US-dollar dominated eurobonds
Gamal Hanafy's ceramic exhibition at Gezira Arts Centre is a must go
Italian Institute Director Davide Scalmani presents activities of the Cairo Institute for ITALIANA.IT platform
Thank you for reporting!
This image will be automatically disabled when it gets reported by several people.
OK
Does Egypt need international election observers?
Michele Dunne
Published in
Almasry Alyoum
on 14 - 10 - 2010
International observers are for newly independent states without the institutions needed to run elections--unlike
Egypt
--according to Moqbel Shaker, vice chairman of
Egypt
's National Human Rights Commission. Shaker reportedly provided this helpful explanation to police officers at a 3 October training seminar related to the upcoming parliamentary elections. But while the fact that the human rights commission is engaging with police is positive, Shaker unfortunately perpetuated a persistent fallacy circulating in
Egypt
regarding international election observers.
Egyptian
officials, including Parliamentary Affairs Minister Mufid Shehab, have so far rebuffed requests by international organizations to observe elections with four questionable justifications: 1) international observers would interfere in the actual administration of elections, which is the province of
Egypt
's electoral commission; 2) international observers are intended to replace or supplant
Egyptian
civil society monitors; 3) only new states or those without confidence in their own institutions invite observers; and 4)
Egyptian
citizens, including those who are close to the opposition, would object to international observers on the grounds of national sovereignty.
The idea that international monitors or observers would interfere in electoral administration reflects a basic confusion about the tasks of supervising, monitoring and observing elections. Supervision of the elections (ishraf in Arabic) is the duty of national officials; in the case of
Egypt
the electoral commission and the ministry of interior share the task. Monitoring and observation, on the other hand, are done by independent civil society organizations, whether
Egyptian
or international and are intended to assess how free and fair the elections were. While the same Arabic terms (muraqaba or raqaba) are often used to cover both of these tasks, in English there is a distinction between the more extensive mission of monitoring and the more restricted task of observation. Monitors generally spend weeks or months assessing the entire process of registering voters and candidates and evaluating access to media and other campaigning issues before elections, and then evaluating challenges or protests that arise after elections. Observers generally spend a much shorter time assessing the process before and after elections and issue more limited reports.
Regarding the issue of international monitors supplanting domestic monitors, this could never be the case in a country the size of
Egypt
. Covering all or even many of the polling and counting stations will require more than ten thousand
Egyptian
monitors, trained by civil society organizations. International observers would number in the dozens and their role would be mainly to support the domestic monitors and publicize their findings regarding the elections.
Perhaps the most stunning falsehood perpetuated in
Egypt
is that strong states do not invite international organizations to monitor their elections. In fact, just the opposite is the case. Not only do major world powers routinely invite credible international organizations to monitor their elections, but so do states in the Middle East. The
United States
,
Canada
,
Russia
, China, the
United Kingdom
,
France
,
Germany
, and virtually all European states have invited organizations such as the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) to monitor national elections held in the last few years. In the Middle East,
Turkey
,
Morocco
,
Lebanon
, Palestine,
Iraq
, and
Yemen
have invited organizations including the OSCE, the European Union, and American groups such as the Carter Center, the National Democratic Institute, and the International Republican Institute. In November,
Jordan
will join these states by inviting such organizations to monitor its parliamentary elections. By refusing to invite credible observers,
Egypt
stands out increasingly as an anachronistic exception to the rule.
Equally hard to swallow is the claim that most
Egyptian
citizens, including those who are close to the opposition, reject international monitoring as an infringement on national sovereignty and an unwanted intervention in domestic affairs. Some recent opinion polls, such as that carried out by WorldPublicOpinion in spring 2009 and another used by Freedom House in its annual report for 2009, suggest that nearly two-thirds of
Egyptians
approve of international monitoring for parliamentary and presidential elections, and do not see it as contradictory to the principle of national sovereignty.
Furthermore, the shifting stance of the
Egyptian
opposition regarding the question of international monitoring for the 2010 parliamentary elections shows that the idea is gaining steam. Opposition parties and movements that once rejected international monitoring are now debating whether this rejection is justified. The Muslim Brotherhood has reversed the stance it took on the eve of the 2005 parliamentary elections, with several of its leaders openly calling for international observers since last year. These statements stress that international monitoring does not represent an interference in
Egyptian
affairs, but rather has become a necessity due to the electoral fraud constantly perpetuated by the regime and its security apparatus.
Joining the Brotherhood in welcoming international monitoring are the Ghad Party, the Democratic Front Party, some non-partisan opposition movements such as the National Association for Change, and all of the nongovernmental organizations engaged in the domestic monitoring process, such as the
Egyptian
Alliance for Monitoring the People's Assembly Elections (an umbrella organization of some 120 NGOs). In October 2009, the leaders of Ghad and the Democratic Front, as well as members of the
Egyptians
against Fraud movement and other figures including the head of the Brotherhood parliamentary bloc Saad al-Katatny, all signed a document calling for international election observers. The petition went on to ask international rights groups, the EU, the African Union, and the Arab League to urge the
Egyptian
government to allow international observers into
Egypt
to oversee the upcoming parliamentary and presidential elections.
The document's signatories gave the following justification for requesting international monitoring:
“The media, judiciary, and rights organizations have all contributed to documenting the grave violations seen in the presidential and legislative elections in 2005, then in the constitutional amendment referendum in March 2007, the Shura Council elections in June 2007, and the local elections in April 2008. In blatant defiance of an independent judiciary and the rule of law, the government as a matter of course ignored hundreds of judicial rulings voiding the elections in a number of electoral districts. The
Egyptian
authorities still deny the right to form political parties, obscure the legitimacy of several political forces, and impede civil society from independently observing the elections. The parties signing this request emphasize the need to invest your political and diplomatic capital with the
Egyptian
authorities in order to convince them to accept your request for monitoring of the elections. In this framework, we call upon you to support the demands of
Egyptian
NGOs to enable them to monitor the electoral process freely and independently, and to guarantee the authorities' cooperation with these organizations to facilitate their work.”
The National Association for Change, meanwhile, in the third article of its “Together, We Will Change” petition, which has garnered the support of 115,664
Egyptian
citizens to date on the Association's website, demands that local and international civil society organizations monitor the elections.
Even opposition groups that have announced their opposition to international monitoring are finding that position difficult to maintain in the face of the aforementioned reasons combined with public sentiment. Tagammu, the most important leftist party in
Egypt
, in a statement by its leader Rifaat al-Saeed rejected international monitoring as an intervention in
Egyptian
affairs, whereas the party's deputy secretary-general Hussein Abdel Razeq announced his cautious support for such monitoring due to the recurring fraud in past elections. The same happened within the Kefaya movement, which has openly acknowledged internal disagreement over the question of monitoring. Kefaya's former coordinator George Ishaq was one of the signatories of the October 2009 document, whereas other leaders such as the current coordinator Abdel Halim Qandil remain opposed to monitoring.
In the Wafd Party, although leaders such as chairman al-Sayed al-Badawy and Secretary General Mounir Fakhry Abdel Nour are united in their opposition to international monitoring, the party is having to work hard to convince the
Egyptian
public of the wisdom of its stance. In their statements in the past few months, al-Badawy and Abdel Nour did not justify their rejection of international monitoring on the grounds that it would constitute interference in domestic affairs. They said rather that it would be impractical for a handful of international monitors to cover a country the size of
Egypt
(which has 40,000 polling places) and expressed concern that the monitors' work would consequently be restricted to the major cities, with the countryside likely to be neglected.
What is certain is that although Wafd is using logistical difficulties as a pretext to reject international monitoring, it is actually as split on the issue as Tagammu and Kefaya are. This clearly shows the growing tendency within opposition movements, as well as a broad sector of the
Egyptian
public, to favor international monitoring as a safeguard against electoral fraud. In the final analysis, these developments greatly reduce the credibility of claims by regime supporters that the
Egyptian
public is dead set against the idea of international monitoring, and make it much more difficult to convince the international community that observers would not be welcomed in
Egypt
.
This article is coauthored by Michele Dunne and Amr Hamzawy. Michele Dunne is a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in
Washington
DC, and Amr Hamzawy is a senior associate at the Carnegie Middle East Center in
Beirut
.
This article is published by agreement with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, ©2010, (http://egyptelections.carnegieendowment.org/).
Clic
here
to read the story from its source.
Related stories
Human Rights Council prepares for elections
A matter of credibility
Govt rights council supports ban on use of religious electoral slogans
Govt-run human rights council shaken up
Across the board
Report inappropriate advertisement