The "Kifonim Documents", published in February 1982 in a journal published in Hebrew in Jerusalem, under the title «Israel's strategy during the 1980s », by «Yoram Beck», contained a full plan to dismantle and divide the Arab world into small states plus a Zionist-US Project aimed at the fragmentation of the Islamic world. We cannot talk about the January 25 Revolution and what happened in Egypt and a number of Arab countries later on without talking about the Western agenda toward the Middle East as a main point. The «Arab Spring» reflected the plans openly declared by America and the West to divide the Arab nation in the light of two considerations: First, the western awareness of the capabilities Arab armies, and the extent of the danger that surrounds Israel since the October 1973 War, particularly the strength of the Egyptian armed forces. Secondly, the use of oil as a weapon to pressure the United States for its pro-Israel stance, which drove the West to control that wealth. From that moment, America worked on dealing with the Arab armies, whether through direct intervention as happened in Iraq and Syria, or indirectly, as happened in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya to either eliminate those armies or to control oil. The US invasion used to get accompanied with oil and energy companies wherever it goes. What happened on January 29, 2003 is a proof on this. Less than two months before the US invasion of Iraq, US Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld said before the Budget Office in the White House that the cost of the Iraq war is about $ 50 billion, adding other countries will bear part of the expenses of this war to rid Iraq from the grip of Saddam Hussein's regime, and possess all the oil wealth above which Baghdad stands. Iraq owns 115 billion barrels of oil reserve, surpassing the U.S oil reserve. The value of Iraqi oil reached to $30 trillion, while the supposed cost of the U.S invasion to Iraq is one trillion dollar. Iraq's Reconstruction Project, the largest privatization project, prompted the International Transparency Organization to issue reports warning of the biggest corruption scandal in the history thanks to this project. So, it is not ruled out that the ideas discussed in the Western documents to turn into facts on the ground even after a while due to the insistence of American aggression to divide the Arab nation just to serve the Zionist vision. The relation between the U.S and Middle East appeared clearly in the theory entitled "Neck of Land" that was adopted by U.S Officer Mehen in his article published by National Review in 1902. This article was to summarize his book "the U.S and Naval Force" that he issued years before. The U.S writer stressed the importance of controlling the lands linking between the East and West to allow the major power control the lands between Africa and Asia, including Turkey, Iran, Egypt and the Eastern side of the Mediterranean. He believe that his country will control the Middle East with its canals, coasts and oil to pave the way for dominating the Far East and consequently the world as whole. If we reviewed what happened later, we would discover that the American officer's vision has been achieved. The U.S inherited the Great Britain controlling the Middle East with its coasts and fuel. It managed to dominate the lands of Muslims geographically, while it failed to do the same historically or psychologically due to the historic differences. The Zionist project aimed to merge between the U.S policies and visions on one hand and the culture of the Middle East in the framework of a new strategic concept of the region in the American policy. The World War one was the first event to attract the U.S to the Middle East. The U.S interfered in this war with men and weapons, while it was forced to participate in reforming the new world through the League of Nations despite the Congressional refusal to join its charter. Balfour Declaration was Arab's fate through the post-war arrangements. Washington supported its approval at Versailles, 1914 and agreed to include a deed includes the British mandate over Palestine. The then US president, Woodrow Wilson, had colluded not only to the Balfour Declaration, but to extend British mandate over Iraq, Transjordan, Syria and Lebanon. It had been a real shock for Egypt when Wilson announced that the right to self-determination, which was the icon of its fourteen principles arranging conditions of post-war world, did not meet its ambitions, and that was not to satisfy its British ally, but it was also due to his lack of regard towards Arabs as well as his awareness to the need of Great Britain and backed by Western powers to control the key strategic pass of earth and most of all, in fact, it was the fulfillment of Wilson's pledge to regain the Holy Land, as he used to described, referring to Palestine, to God's chosen people. It was not only a personal commitment, but was also an expression of «the longing» of the political elite, cultural, and religious America, as well as public opinion to remove «the stain», Arabs possess and rule over Palestine and Jerusalem. Besides these two tracks of US' presence, the newcomer to the Middle East, was digging 2 new courses, the first was the decolonization of the traditional enemy then inherit its land, while the second was the gradual control of the newfound oil resources of which all to lead later to the largest track, thus confronting the communism expansion, and this was the station that hosted the first and longest meeting between political Islam and US. By the 90' of the twentieth century, the US-led unipolar New World Order was launched on the basis of what had been achieved from its unique capabilities in all fields, especially its military abilities, and also based on the disintegration of the Soviet Union camp. The Gulf War II was the first declaration of the strategy of this new regime in dealing with international crises through an international coalition led by US facing «rogue» states in order to force them to keep pace with this system. Then it developed to take over by itself with limited participation of its allies to apply its strategic objectives, especially in the war against terrorism which erupted since the beginning of the third millennium which targeted several areas in the Middle East as direct targets to apply its own new strategy of pre-emptive strikes using sophisticated arm systems, command and control which was unprecedented worldwide. The new world order targeted particularly the Middle East which witnessed a number of wars and armed conflicts in addition to attempts of polarization which had been generated by America backed by the NATO, the long mighty arm of the new world order of which US was keen to keep it active despite of the dismantled Warsaw Pact after the collapse of the Soviet Union, NATO had developed from being a front that defended Europe against the Soviet Union to become the military political management for confrontation crises in the world in favor of the West. US was enough keen to keep NATO standing to thwart European intentions aimed to form an independent military force which could possibly turn against it later. US had forced the European countries to continue supporting the pact as the only option through which it achieved its objectives, but also benefited from the capabilities of the European countries in achieving those goals and affordability on its behalf. Bernard Lewis Project In 1980 and during the raging war between Iran and Iraq, US National Security Adviser, Brzezinski stressed that the dilemma would face US since then was how to engulf a second Gulf war which could be based on the sidelines of the first Gulf War of which US could correct the Sykes-Picot borders. His statement was followed, commissioned by Pentagon. In 1981, Orientalist British Jewish, Bernard Lewis started to set down his famous suggestion of the new plan aimed to dismantle the constitutional unity of the Group of Arab and Islamic countries, individually. It included Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt, Sudan, Iran, Turkey, AfghanistanPakistan, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States and the countries of North Africa. Through fragmentation of each of these countries into groups of cantons ethnic, religious and sectarian mini-states. With his project, he attached detailed set of maps drawn under his supervision include all Arab and Islamic countries qualified for fragmentation inspired by the content of the statement Brzezinski, US Security Adviser National. Bernard Lewis' project was based on defaming Arab and Muslims' reputation and civilization defining them as corrupters and anarchists could never get civilized, and if they were not limited they could surprise the world by waves of terror that could destroy civilizations and paralyze communities. Therefore, the appropriate solution was the re-occupation, colonization and destruction of their culture and social applications, benefiting from the British and French expertise in colonizing huge swathes in the region. Lewis stressed on the need to re-divide the Arab and Islamic countries to tribal and sectarian units while the announced mission was to enhance masses to exercise democracy, and therefore must clamp down on and besiege them as well as invest ethnic contradictions and tribal sectarian partisanship before been under US and Europe's invasion. He as well pointed out that the Zionist entity is a front-line defense of Western civilization, as he stood lookout in front of the Islamic hatred towards Europe and US. The current Iranian state was the axis of the Western project rooting sectarianism in addition to its old dreams of expansion through the region which led the Persian state policies since its inception till now, charging its hatred against Sunni Muslim ideology. From its territories the still raging sedition and sectarianism were launched when Western colonial powers supported the Iranian opposition during the rule of Shah to enable the mullahs in order to invest Sunni-Shiite discord to push the Western project forward. It was enough to figure how was the persistence of Louis on his goal, his permanent criticizing towards the attempts of peaceful solution to the Arab-Zionist conflict and his criticism of the Israeli withdrawal from southern Lebanon, describing the withdrawal as a hasty action and unjustified, as Zionism represented the front lines of the Western civilization. In 2007, when US called to ‘Annapolis' peace conference, through ‘Wall Street' gazette, Lewis said: ‘we should consider this conference and its results as a temporary tactic that aims to strengthen the alliance against the Iranian threat, and to facilitate the dismantling of Arab and Islamic countries, and push Turks, Kurds, Arabs and Iranians and the Palestinians to fight against each other, as US did previously with the Indians'. In 1983, the US Congress unanimously approved in a secret session the project to be adopted and included in the American politics strategic files in the coming years. Mechanisms and plans were put for its implementation, and were completed in the wake of the end of the Cold War and the dismantling of the Eastern Bloc in the early nineties. This has divided the world into 19 countries, all consists of a mixture of minorities and different communities, and hostile to each other, and therefore all Arab Islamic State exposed today to the risk of fragmentation of ethnic and social at home, to end the internal war as is the case in some of those countries.
