White House renews virus briefings: Many more still will die    Emigration minister calls on Egyptian expats to participate in rehabilitating poorest villages under Decent Life initiative    In Photos: 5,000 stolen artefacts returned to Egypt    Oil slips as COVID-19 and demand concerns weigh ahead of supply report    Egypt FM, EU Special Representative discuss efforts to revive Israeli-Palestinian peace process    Egypt's stocks end higher, benchmark EGX 30 gains 0.45% on Wednesday    UNCTAD: Egypt remains Africa's top destination for FDI despite pandemic    Egypt contracts French RATP to manage Cairo's new electric train line    Mali army and French forces kill 100 extremists this month    Arsenal signs midfielder Odegaard on loan from Real Madrid    Egypt's TAQA Arabia IPO may be delayed to beyond Q1-2022    Tunisian press syndicate criticise police over night arrest    EU meeting with Astra on vaccine supplies canceled after firm pulls out: EU official    Asian Champions League holders Ulsan to face debutants in group phase    Tennis: Nadal, Serena support strict COVID-19 protocols in Australia    Egypt reports 643 new coronavirus cases, 55 deaths on Tuesday    Cabinet under fire    Rana Haggag's jazz concert at Room Art Space & Café is a must go    Scheherazade retold    Cabinet building    Egypt announces resumption of maritime navigation with Qatar    Egyptian FM to deliver statement on foreign policy before parliament Tuesday    Egypt confirms 669 new coronavirus cases, 53 deaths on Monday    Egypt launches website for vaccination registration    Egypt joins Netherlands, Malawi in supporting UK-led scheme to fight against climate change    New daily Coronavirus cases continued to fall over the weekend    BREAKING: Egypt resumes diplomatic relations with Qatar ending 4-year boycott    Egypt eyes gradual return for tourism after revenues fall to $4 bln in 2020    Seasoned Egyptian screenwriter Wahid Hamed dies at 76    Coronavirus strikes Egypt's youth team as 17 players, coach test positive    Nassef Sawiris plans to up his stake in owner of New York Knicks, Rangers    Cairo International Book Fair suspended for five months over coronavirus concerns    Egypt unveils largest archaeological discovery in 2020 with over 100 intact sarcophagi    Trump says won't blame Egypt for being ‘upset' over GERD dispute with Ethiopia    Egypt, Ethiopia, Sudan to resume Nile dam talks today    Global Finance: Egypt's Tarek Amer among the world's top 20 central bank governors    The Facebook Preacher's Search for Fame, and Egypt's Economy    Egypt calls on UNSC to address oil spill risks off Yemen coast    Egypt economically strong in face of COVID-19, reforms ongoing: International Cooperation Minister    Arafa Holding reports $144,000 COVID-19-related losses in April    Egypt's efforts in Libya to activate free will of Libyan people: Al-Sisi    Hyksos campaigns were internal takeover, not foreign invaders: study    COVID-19 affects Egypt sporting clubs    COVID-19 will soon turn to seasonal like swine flu: Presidential Health Advisor    ‘Egypt's Support' coalition convenes to discuss its Senate election list    Robbery attempt leads to discovery of Ptolemaic monuments in Qena    Flouting international guidance, Ethiopia unilaterally starts filling its Nile dam    Zaha speaks out after online racial abuse    







Thank you for reporting!
This image will be automatically disabled when it gets reported by several people.





Netanyahu's latest rant
Published in Al-Ahram Weekly on 12 - 03 - 2014

Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu gave one of his typical speeches at this year's AIPAC (American Israel Public Affair's Committee) convention in Washington. Before he delivered his usual sermon about Iran and the other “terrorists” in the region, he implored the friendship and alliance between Israel and the United States. This time, neither President Barack Obama nor Vice President Joe Biden showed up.
Netanyahu's main purpose of coming to Washington was, however, to strengthen the forces of opposition to talks between Iran and the five members of the UN Security Council plus Germany. For Palestinian negotiators, he erected insurmountable political obstacles in order to prevent a durable peace agreement by demanding that the Palestinians recognise Israel as a Jewish state — for the Palestinian leadership a non-starter. Netanyahu also rejected international peacekeeping forces in the occupied Palestinian territories, and insisted on a future military presence in the Jordan Valley. In addition to Iran, he also criticised the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement. According to him, it's the “latest chapter in a long and dark history of anti-Semitism”. And “those who wear” the BDS label should be “treated exactly as we treat any anti-Semite”.
After he had distinguished himself as a champion in the drawing of “red lines”, he attacked the “forces of terror” sharply — Iran, Bashar Al-Assad, Hizbullah, Al-Qaeda and many others. He drew Israel in the best colours and praised the country as a palladium of humanity and charity. “Israel is humane; Israel is compassionate; Israel is a force for good,” he said. Whether the Palestinians under occupation would agree may be doubted. However, there is no doubt that Israeli physicians provide medical help for some of the oppressed in Palestine who make it across the borders or emergency medical assistance for refugees from Syria in the Golan Heights.
Again, Netanyahu demonised Iran as the “worst terrorist regime on the planet” whose leaders can't be trusted. “If we allow this outlaw terrorist state to enrich uranium, how could we seriously demand that any other country not enrich uranium?” He said Iran had “violated multiple UN Security Council resolutions prohibiting enrichment”. Not Iran but Israel has violated for the last 46 years scores of UN Security Council resolutions by preventing their implementation to solve the Middle East conflict.
Beyond that, Israel's huge nuclear arsenal, and its biological and chemical weapons, is off limits for inspectors, whereas Iran has granted the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) full access to all nuclear installations. It is not Iran that is a threat for its neighbours in the region but Israel, which not only politically and economically strangles a helpless people, but also bombs some of its neighbouring states on a regular basis. Netanyahu seems hell-bent to even prevent Iran's right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes, to which every nation has a right. “We will make sure it does not happen,” he said.
Conversely, this means that if the negotiations can't be derailed by “Israel's US troops”, like AIPAC lobbyists, the neo-cons, or members of Congress, the Israeli government might attack Iran's nuclear facilities single-handed. Netanyahu even called for more pressure instead of relieving it. The more pressure is applied, he argued, the less likely is war. The more credible the threat of force, the smaller the chance that force will ever have to be used, he continued. According to this logic, the Iranians and the Palestinian Arabs only understand the language of force.
In his short appearance before the press with Obama, Netanyahu put the blame on the Palestinians for not having advanced the prospects of peace. For the Israeli leader, security is paramount. He called on the Palestinians to compromise; in reality, however, they are already naked. The Israeli government has all the political bargaining chips in its hands. Nevertheless, it demands the last shirt of a prostrate beggar. Before the US government imposes an agreement on the Palestinians their negotiators should end this charade and leave the “peace talks”. When Israelis and Palestinians negotiated “peace” under the Ehud Olmert government, Saeb Erekat, the chief Palestinian negotiator, expressed to Tzipi Livni the desperate plight of the Palestinians as follows: “The only thing I cannot do is convert to Zionism.”
To recognise a Jewish state would mean for the Palestinians to recognise the Zionist narrative about “Eretz Israel” in which there is no place for the Palestinian people. Arafat, Abbas and their ilk have already recognised the State of Israel several times. According to international law, it is irrelevant whether the leadership of a state considers its state being Jewish, Buddhist, Christian or atheist. In his letter of recognition, President Harry Truman crossed out “Jewish State” and replaced it with “State of Israel”. Why should the Palestinians offer more than the Americans?
In order to be successful in the negotiations with Iran and the Palestinians, the US government must abolish its weird image of the Iranians and the Palestinians, which is strongly determined by Israel and its friends from the Zionist lobby. If one stigmatises the elected Iranian or Hamas Palestinian leadership as “terrorists”, as Netanyahu does, negotiations are meaningless. To exclude the legitimate and democratically elected Hamas-run Palestinian government from the “peace talks” means to push half of the Palestinian population aside. Since David Ben-Gurion, it's an old tactic of the different Israeli governments to caricature the Arabs as terrorists in order to conceal its own rejectionist attitude towards peace.
This rejectionist attitude of the Israeli leadership is documented by Zalman Amit and Daphna Levit in their book Israeli Rejectionism, which sets the record straight. For the authors, Israel is not interested in peace “unless such a peace was totally on its own terms”. The Israeli leadership constantly proclaims its commitment to peace, like Netanyahu did in his AIPAC speech. But its real political strategy has been to thwart any real possibility of peace. Its leadership has been convinced “that peace is not in Israel's interest”. This peace-rejecting attitude can be traced back to the first Zionist leaders such as Theodor Herzl and especially Ben-Gurion, the authors argue. It is not that Israel lacks a viable “partner for peace”, as Israeli propaganda tells the public. It is the other way around: the Palestinians have no reliable and serious “partner for peace”. Even the Americans are not honest brokers, because they have strong links to Israel.
The time for an agreement between Israelis and Palestinians is running out. To gain more time, the Americans will perhaps come up with an interim agreement, which will set a new timeframe till the end of the year. To date, no American government has been able to accomplish peace in the Middle East. Why should the Obama administration be successful, considering that Netanyahu dislikes the US president? In order to have success, the Americans must firmly insist on the implementation of international law, because in the implementation of UN resolutions lies the answer to the conflict. Should international law again be pushed aside, there will be peace without justice; and so no peace.
The writer is a journalist and editor in Bonn, Germany.


Clic here to read the story from its source.