Egypt, Elsewedy review progress on Ain Sokhna phosphate complex    US employment cost index 3.6% up in year to June 2025    Egypt welcomes Canada, Malta's decision to recognise Palestinian state    Pakistan says successfully concluded 'landmark trade deal' with US    Sterling set for sharpest monthly drop since 2022    Egypt, Brazil sign deal to boost pharmaceutical cooperation    Modon Holding posts AED 2.1bn net profit in H1 2025    Egypt's Electricity Ministry says new power cable for Giza area operational    Egypt's Al-Sisi, Italian defence minister discuss Gaza, security cooperation    Egypt's FM discusses Gaza, Nile dam with US senators    Aid airdrops intensify as famine deepens in Gaza amid mounting international criticism    Egypt exports first high-tech potato seeds to Uzbekistan after opening market    Health minister showcases AI's impact on healthcare at Huawei Cloud Summit    On anti-trafficking day, Egypt's PM calls fight a 'moral and humanitarian duty'    Egypt strengthens healthcare partnerships to enhance maternity, multiple sclerosis, and stroke care    Egypt keeps Gaza aid flowing, total tops 533,000 tons: minister    Indian Embassy to launch cultural festival in Assiut, film fest in Cairo    Egyptian aid convoy heads toward Gaza as humanitarian crisis deepens    Culture minister launches national plan to revive film industry, modernise cinematic assets    I won't trade my identity to please market: Douzi    Sisi sends letter to Nigerian president affirming strategic ties    Two militants killed in foiled plot to revive 'Hasm' operations: Interior ministry    Egypt, Somalia discuss closer environmental cooperation    Egypt's EHA, Huawei discuss enhanced digital health    Foreign, housing ministers discuss Egypt's role in African development push    Egypt reveals heritage e-training portal    Three ancient rock-cut tombs discovered in Aswan    Sisi launches new support initiative for families of war, terrorism victims    Egypt expands e-ticketing to 110 heritage sites, adds self-service kiosks at Saqqara    Egypt's Irrigation Minister urges scientific cooperation to tackle water scarcity    Palm Hills Squash Open debuts with 48 international stars, $250,000 prize pool    On Sport to broadcast Pan Arab Golf Championship for Juniors and Ladies in Egypt    Golf Festival in Cairo to mark Arab Golf Federation's 50th anniversary    Germany among EU's priciest labour markets – official data    Paris Olympic gold '24 medals hit record value    A minute of silence for Egyptian sports    Russia says it's in sync with US, China, Pakistan on Taliban    It's a bit frustrating to draw at home: Real Madrid keeper after Villarreal game    Shoukry reviews with Guterres Egypt's efforts to achieve SDGs, promote human rights    Sudan says countries must cooperate on vaccines    Johnson & Johnson: Second shot boosts antibodies and protection against COVID-19    Egypt to tax bloggers, YouTubers    Egypt's FM asserts importance of stability in Libya, holding elections as scheduled    We mustn't lose touch: Muller after Bayern win in Bundesliga    Egypt records 36 new deaths from Covid-19, highest since mid June    Egypt sells $3 bln US-dollar dominated eurobonds    Gamal Hanafy's ceramic exhibition at Gezira Arts Centre is a must go    Italian Institute Director Davide Scalmani presents activities of the Cairo Institute for ITALIANA.IT platform    







Thank you for reporting!
This image will be automatically disabled when it gets reported by several people.



A moment of reckoning
Published in Ahram Online on 27 - 07 - 2021

On 26 July 1956, president Gamal Abdel- Nasser nationalised the Suez Canal. In his annual address to the nation from Manshiya Square in Alexandria, he said that the famous canal would now become Egypt's exclusive property. Until that point, Egypt had had no control over it because it was run by a foreign-owned firm, and the country obtained only five per cent of its revenues. Although six decades have passed since that day, we still find people who question whether the nationalisation proclamation was worth it, given how it triggered the Tripartite Aggression by France, Britain and Israel in November that year.
Ironically, rather than harm us, the invasion boosted Egypt's political might and confirmed its role as a post-colonial leader. Egypt became a model for the third world countries of Asia, Africa and Latin America struggling for independence and control over their national resources. Fidel Castro once acknowledged that Nasser's nationalisation of the Suez Canal had inspired the Cuban revolution, which occurred some years later. One of Castro's first actions, after the revolution succeeded, was to nationalise all the US oil refineries in the country. Meanwhile, the Tripartite Aggression proved a fiasco in the lead-up to the collapse of the old British and French colonial empires.
Critics of the nationalisation of the canal argue that the foreign company's concession was going to expire in 1968 anyway, after which ownership would revert to Egypt automatically, so there was no need for nationalisation and the war that followed. That argument is a misleading oversimplification showing a weak grasp of the realities which clearly indicated that the foreign powers affiliated with the company planned to retain control of the canal even after the concession expired. The very fact that Britain and France went to war in order to seize control of the canal militarily already confirms that they never intended to let it out of their grip. If they truly intended to hand over the canal after the concession expired, they wouldn't have gone to the trouble of holding secret war planning meetings in Sèvres or incurred such exorbitant economic, military and political costs.
Ever since 1909, the Universal Company of the Maritime Company of Suez had persistently tried to have the concession extended for another 30 years. Shortly before the nationalisation, Jacques Georges-Picot, who served as the company's French general-director until it was nationalised, said the company had sent memoranda to France, Britain, the US and Italy, warning of problems that would arise when the concession expired and urging those governments to intervene to internationalise the canal. London and Washington rejected the request for fear that it would give an opening to the USSR to participate in negotiations, since Tsarist Russia had been a party to the 1888 Convention of Constantinople regulating the use of the Suez Canal. As for the countries that were parties to the concession, they preferred extension over internationalisation.
The company then put together a group of prominent British figures to launch an international campaign to keep the canal administration under foreign control. Their role was to spread alarm over the impending handover of the canal to Egypt which, they said, would lead to the withdrawal of the foreign supervisors and the consequent malfunctioning of the waterway. In 1954, the company also organised a massive media campaign in the US to build up pressure on officials in Washington to support the idea of creating an international authority based in Egypt to supervise the canal.
Critics of the decision to nationalise the canal also argue that Egypt was forced to pay huge sums of money as compensation to the company's foreign shareholders. In the 1990s I had the opportunity to meet Jean-Paul Calon, the honorary president of the Association du Souvenir de Ferdinand de Lesseps et du Canal de Suez, who had represented France in the negotiations with Egypt over the amount of compensation the Egyptian government owed the shareholders after nationalisation. He told me that the French shareholders had received all the amounts due to them on time and that the amount they received was used to establish the association of which he was now the honorary president. In addition to activities intended to keep alive de Lesseps' memory, the association also organises a range of cultural activities related to the canal and its history. Some years ago, Colon donated an important collection of historical documents that his association had possessed.
What many critics and others do not realise is that the natural expiry of the concession and handover of the canal to Egyptian administration would also have cost Egypt quite a lot. One of the terms of the concessionary contract stipulated that, upon expiry, Egypt would have to compensate the company for all the company's machinery, equipment and materials, and that the price of these items would be determined by mutual agreement and, if that was not possible, then by experts. That would naturally have left the door open to disputes, which would have prevented the handover of the canal on time.
The decision to nationalise spared Egypt all these problems and ensured the return of the canal to its legitimate owners, the descendants of those who built it and who now enjoy its revenues in full.


*A version of this article appears in print in the 29 July, 2021 edition of Al-Ahram Weekly.


Clic here to read the story from its source.