The terrorist attack on the British parliament, on Wednesday showed UK as a country in a terrorist dangerous, according to number of political expert. Political experts said that British Foreign Minister, Boris Johnson was wrong, when he said that his country is Anti-Terrorism country. "Johnson" stressed during his speech that Britain is immune and safe against terrorism, which confirms that the organization "Dahesh" sends a strong message to Britain to intimidate after participating in the conference of the International Alliance, and will resolve its hesitant position to face the organization to take escalating measures towards terrorist organizations, Including the Muslim Brotherhood, which was the incubator of the intellectual organization "Dahesh." Dr. Tarek Fahmy, a professor of political science at Cairo Community, says that the timing of the terrorist attack has great internal and external connotations. The first is that he is bombarding the letters of reassurance by Britain. Secondly, he confirms that the organization of Da'ash entered a real confrontation with the coalition forces, most notably Britain, The United States recently launched landing operations for 400 infantry troops in the Al-Raqqa area of Syria, as well as the deployment of defense batteries, as well as deployment of 1,000 troops in northern Syria. Fahmy told Al-Bawaba that he was facing a real strategic dilemma and that the attack on Britain would not be the last, but would extend to all the countries participating in the alliance. He would also make Britain's position strong against the sources of terrorism after it was relaxed during the coming period , and about targeting the attack to the British House of Commons precisely and the significance of that politically. Fahmi added that the target was the prime minister because its history is not honorable with the violence, and investigations were being opened and closed. This is pushing Britain to carry out counterterrorism operations and to review security policies in response to the attack on London from inside and confronting the phenomenon of fighters. Britain's retreat from support for the Muslim Brotherhood and political Islam groups will be discussed in the British House of Commons, because the terrorist attack is not merely an absurd scene, but it will be followed by a series of attacks and will have major implications for Britain's exit from the EU. Fahmy refused to call the term "individual wolves", which he promoted to a large number of media outlets, describing the term as superficial and inappropriate for the terrorist incident, which is part of a global strategy of terrorist organizations to confront Europe for its participation in the international coalition to eliminate "Dahesh." Fahmy added that Britain will have a deterrent measures in conjunction with the invitation of US President Donald Trump to counter terrorism, to stop the increasing levels of violence and coordination between America and Britain in NATO, and the reflection on the possibility of a new referendum Britain. In the same context, Dr. Hassan Salameh, political science professor at Cairo Group, said that Britain would not be after the terrorist incident as it was before, because it would take deterrent steps and great security threats, because the terrorist incident was sending a strong message that the terrorist operation is very codified and able to reach the depth of Britain From the inside, which will make the latter take action similar to what the US president took to combat the phenomenon of terrorism. "This attack gives a warning signal to the rest of the European countries, which will in turn be reflected in the visa systems, the carrying of equipment on airplanes, and will have a bad reflection on the review of Britain's relationship with other people supporting terrorism," Salameh said.
