The government will not be paying a cash subsidy of LE1,400 per feddan to cotton producers as it did last year, Adel Al-Beltagui, minister of agriculture and land reclamation, said last week. High cultivation costs, together with low local and international demand for Egyptian cotton, particularly the long-staple variety, were the main reasons behind the decision, Al-Beltagui said. He advised farmers not to cultivate cotton unless they had the means to market it as many spinning companies are refusing to buy the local and, compared to cheaper imported cotton, more expensive long-staple produce. The government has long given subsidies to cotton producers to make up for the gap between the high price of Egyptian raw cotton and the final price of products, which can be less than total production costs. Last year the Ministry of Agriculture introduced a new cotton subsidies system providing LE1,400 per feddan for farmers through the Principal Bank for Development and Agricultural Credit (PBDAC). “The subsidy was instituted by the Ministry of Agriculture on a temporary basis last year in response to the farmers' problems,” Mohamed Abdel-Maguid, chairman of the Egyptian Cotton Council, said. However, the farmers did not benefit from the subsidy as traders reduced the price of the cotton they bought from growers by LE200 per qentar, Abdel-Maguid said. The average productivity of a feddan is seven qentars of cotton. According to Abdel-Maguid, the cancellation of the subsidy was the right decision and it should help regulate the cultivation of cotton. “Due to the lack of a clear plan, farmers used to plant cotton and then complain after harvesting it that they were unable to sell their crop,” Abdel-Maguid said. Deputy Agriculture Minister Hamdi Aasi told Reuters that removing the subsidy would benefit farmers because instead of the government giving direct support to producers amid price volatility in the global market, it would help coordinate favourable contracts between companies purchasing the crop and farmers. “This will give farmers a profit margin, instead of their dealing with the free market that goes up and down and endangers them with its price fluctuations,” Aasi added. Mohamed Qassem, chairman of the World Trading Company, a leading producer and exporter of ready-made garments, said that the subsidy had not been the correct solution to the industry's problems, and that it should anyway have been included in a comprehensive strategy to deal with the long-neglected issue. Textiles producers drew up a plan to help solve the cotton producers' problems, but it was ignored by the government, Qassem said. The plan had included upgrading the quality of the cotton harvest, marketing it properly on international markets, and restructuring the state-owned spinning, weaving and textiles companies. These companies were losing around LE2.2 billion a year, Qassem said, in addition to accumulated losses of LE28.7 billion. The use of the Egyptian long-staple variety of cotton in the local public-sector spinning and weaving companies, along with the high costs of labour, were responsible for the losses, according to Qassem. Experts agree that Egyptian cotton has been facing problems since liberalisation of the industry in 1994. “We should ask ourselves why we are planting cotton. Is it for local industry or for export?” Abdel-Maguid said. “If it is for local industry, the textiles producers should determine their needs and conclude contracts with farmers before the cultivation season. If it is for export and with a view to keeping Egypt's share in the international markets, exporters should do the same thing,” he added. If no one is interested in buying locally produced cotton, farmers should be directed to cultivate other crops, he said. The market for Egypt's high-quality extra-long staple cotton, once known as the country's “white gold,” has been shrinking for years. Ibrahim Ghanem, former head of the Agricultural Economic Research Institute, said that farmers turned to more lucrative crops and local textile firms shifted their focus to making low-quality products with cheap raw cotton imports. But the decision to stop the subsidy was one of a series of bad policies applied by the government that left farmers unprotected, Ghanem said. “In order to keep cotton as a strategic cash crop and encourage farmers to plant it, the government should keep the subsidies provided to farmers and announce a suitable price for cotton before the cultivation season in March. All concerned ministries should cooperate in marketing the cotton harvest locally and internationally,” he argued. Nasr Al-Qazaz, a professor of agricultural economics at Al-Azhar University in Cairo, said that the liberalisation of Egypt's cotton sector in 1994 exposed farmers to volatile global prices and rising fertiliser costs. Cotton acreage fell dramatically, from 2.2 million feddans in the 1960s to 320,000 feddans today, which constituted four per cent of the country's arable land and produced 1.5 million to two million qentars annually, he said. Al-Qazaz, who had reservations about cancelling the subsidies, said that if the government is obliged to do so it should help market the cotton in cooperation with private and public-sector companies. “Leaving farmers without subsidies or available marketing programmes is de-motivating for them and will mark an end to cotton production in Egypt. The country was once famous for its cotton, especially under British colonial rule,” Al-Qazaz said. He said that in almost all countries growing cotton the crop is supported by some kind of subsidy, particularly in the United States, which subsidised all production phases of its Pima, extra-long staple, cotton. Egypt could cultivate the less costly short and medium-staple cotton in order to meet local needs instead of importing three million qentars of it annually, he said. The value of Egypt's raw cotton exports was down from $120.3 million in 2012-2013 to $83.8 million in 2013-2014, according to Central Bank of Egypt figures.
