Putting words in the mouth of the US president-elect, John Whitbeck* outlines what Obama would say if he were serious about change in world affairs President-elect Barack Obama has a problem. Particularly in the wake of Israel's holiday-season massacre of Gazans, he is under heavy pressure to focus immediately on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and to "do something". However, if he were simply to announce an intention to work harder to achieve an impossible goal by means that have repeatedly failed (a decent "two-state solution" through bilateral Israeli-Palestinian negotiations), such a commitment to further years of time-wasting would kill hope rather than inspire it, and hence be counterproductive. Furthermore, Obama's entourage has let it be known that he would like to make a major speech in a Muslim country early on in his presidency. A welcome gesture, to be sure, but what would he say? If he were simply to promise "more of the same", as he did during his campaign, his frustrated audience might be tempted to throw shoes. What could he say that would be new and exciting, would truly represent "change" in US policy and would inspire genuine and justified hope that Middle East peace really is possible? A conclusion to his speech along the following lines would offer "change to believe in", "audacious hope", and could produce a far better future for Israelis, Palestinians and all mankind than most people would dare to dream possible in these somber days: "During the 20 years since the Palestinian leadership formally committed itself to seeking peace with some measure of justice through a 'two-state solution', virtually the entire international community has, at some point, come to subscribe, at least formally, to that goal. Unfortunately, during those same 20 years, the realistic possibility of actually achieving a decent two-state solution has become more remote with each passing year. Constantly expanding 'facts on the ground' that render a viable and coherent Palestinian state virtually inconceivable have aggravated the multitude of excruciatingly complicated and difficult 'final status' issues that have proven too sensitive even for serious discussion between the Israeli and Palestinian leaderships. As a result, the most knowledgeable and realistic observers have reluctantly concluded that a decent two- state solution is no longer possible. "I therefore call on Israelis, Palestinians and all who truly care about peace, justice and the best interests of both Israelis and Palestinians to consider the only other acceptable alternative -- democracy: a single state in all of the land that both Israelis and Palestinians love and consider rightfully theirs, with full and equal rights for both peoples and free of any form of discrimination based on race, religion or any other distinction, in accordance with the inspiring aspiration of the United States and all true democracies. "Just as marriage is vastly less complicated than divorce, democracy is vastly less complicated than partition. A democratic solution to this century-old conflict would not require any borders to be agreed, any division of Jerusalem, anyone to move from his current home or any assets to be evaluated and apportioned. Full rights of citizenship would simply be extended to all surviving natives still living in the country, as happened in the United States in the early 20th century and in South Africa in the late 20th century. "The obstacle to such a simple and morally unimpeachable solution is, of course, ethical, intellectual and psychological -- on both sides of the current divide. No one would suggest that the ethical, intellectual and psychological transformation necessary to achieve a democratic one-state solution would be easy. However, since the only transformations necessary would be in the human mind, they could occur suddenly under proper leadership and inspiration. In any event, it is in no one's interests to waste further time before striving to inspire minds to accept the only remaining acceptable alternative to perpetual hatred and bloodshed. "In this context, Israelis might wish to consider and reflect upon the experience of white South Africans. The transformation of South Africa's racial-supremacist ideology and state system into a truly democratic one has liberated white South Africans, as well as black South Africans, and has transformed white South Africans from international pariahs into people welcomed throughout their region and the world. It has also ensured the permanence of a strong and vital white presence in southern Africa in a way that prolonging the flagrant injustice of a racial-supremacist ideology and state system and imposing fragmented and dependent 'independent states' on the natives could never have achieved. This is not a precedent to dismiss. It is one that could and should inspire. "As an incentive to encourage all Israelis to adopt a more humanistic, humane, hopeful and democratic view of present realities and future possibilities and as an accommodation to those Israelis who might have difficulty doing so, the United States would commit, upon the implementation of such a democratic one-state solution, to welcome in the United States any Jewish Israelis who held Israeli citizenship as of today and who would then prefer to resettle in the United States, according them an immediate right of residence and a fast track to citizenship. The United States would also encourage other countries, particularly those with a moral obligation towards the Jewish people, to make the same generous offer. "I solemnly call upon not only Israelis and Palestinians but upon nations and peoples everywhere to unite to make this vision of peace through democracy and equal rights a reality and, by doing so, to make the world in which we live, and in which future generations will live, a far better and safer world than the one in which we have lived in recent decades and in which we live today." Likely? Of course not. Possible? Absolutely. All that is needed is a US president with true ethical values and a genuine belief in democracy who is willing to risk putting the interests of his country and mankind ahead of narrow calculations of personal political self-interest. It is far from certain that America has finally elected such a president, but it is certainly possible. If Barack Obama dared to advocate democracy as the path to peace for Israelis and Palestinians at the start of his presidency, and to press for its achievement in the years remaining to him, it might well happen. No greater service to mankind can be imagined. * The writer is an international lawyer who has advised the Palestinian negotiating team in negotiations with Israel.
