Front Page
Politics
Economy
International
Sports
Society
Culture
Videos
Newspapers
Ahram Online
Al-Ahram Weekly
Albawaba
Almasry Alyoum
Amwal Al Ghad
Arab News Agency
Bikya Masr
Daily News Egypt
FilGoal
The Egyptian Gazette
Youm7
Subject
Author
Region
f
t
مصرس
Egyptian public, private sectors off on Apr 25 marking Sinai Liberation
Egypt's SCZONE welcomes Zhejiang Province delegation for trade talks
Beltone Venture Capital partners with Citadel International to manage $30m startup fund
S. Africa to use contingency reserves to tackle debt
Gaza health authorities urge action for cancer, chronic disease patients
Transport Minister discusses progress on supplying new railway carriages with Hungarian company
Egypt's local gold prices see minor rise on April 18th
Expired US license impacts Venezuela crude exports
Taiwan's TSMC profit ups in Q1
Yen Rises, dollar retreats as G7 eyes currency calm
Egypt, Bahrain vow joint action to end Gaza crisis
Egypt looks forward to mobilising sustainable finance for Africa's public health: Finance Minister
Egypt's Ministry of Health initiates 90 free medical convoys
Egypt, Serbia leaders vow to bolster ties, discuss Mideast, Ukraine crises
Singapore leads $5b initiative for Asian climate projects
Karim Gabr inaugurates 7th International Conference of BUE's Faculty of Media
EU pledges €3.5b for oceans, environment
Egypt forms supreme committee to revive historic Ahl Al-Bayt Trail
Debt swaps could unlock $100b for climate action
Acts of goodness: Transforming companies, people, communities
Eid in Egypt: A Journey through Time and Tradition
President Al-Sisi embarks on new term with pledge for prosperity, democratic evolution
Amal Al Ghad Magazine congratulates President Sisi on new office term
Tourism Minister inspects Grand Egyptian Museum, Giza Pyramids
Egypt's healthcare sector burgeoning with opportunities for investors – minister
Egypt starts construction of groundwater drinking water stations in South Sudan
Russians in Egypt vote in Presidential Election
Egyptian, Japanese Judo communities celebrate new coach at Tokyo's Embassy in Cairo
Uppingham Cairo and Rafa Nadal Academy Unite to Elevate Sports Education in Egypt with the Introduction of the "Rafa Nadal Tennis Program"
Egypt's powerhouse 'The Tank' Hamed Khallaf secures back-to-back gold at World Cup Weightlifting Championship"
Financial literacy becomes extremely important – EGX official
Euro area annual inflation up to 2.9% – Eurostat
Egypt builds 8 groundwater stations in S. Sudan
BYD، Brazil's Sigma Lithium JV likely
UNESCO celebrates World Arabic Language Day
Motaz Azaiza mural in Manchester tribute to Palestinian journalists
Russia says it's in sync with US, China, Pakistan on Taliban
It's a bit frustrating to draw at home: Real Madrid keeper after Villarreal game
Shoukry reviews with Guterres Egypt's efforts to achieve SDGs, promote human rights
Sudan says countries must cooperate on vaccines
Johnson & Johnson: Second shot boosts antibodies and protection against COVID-19
Egypt to tax bloggers, YouTubers
Egypt's FM asserts importance of stability in Libya, holding elections as scheduled
We mustn't lose touch: Muller after Bayern win in Bundesliga
Egypt records 36 new deaths from Covid-19, highest since mid June
Egypt sells $3 bln US-dollar dominated eurobonds
Gamal Hanafy's ceramic exhibition at Gezira Arts Centre is a must go
Italian Institute Director Davide Scalmani presents activities of the Cairo Institute for ITALIANA.IT platform
Thank you for reporting!
This image will be automatically disabled when it gets reported by several people.
OK
Demons of the Nakbah
Ilan Pappe
Published in
Al-Ahram Weekly
on 16 - 05 - 2002
Israel has long denied its responsibility for the events of 1948, the Nakbah, that forced the Palestinian population from Palestine at the point of
Israeli
guns. However, today when recognition of the wrongs done to the Palestinians in 1948 is finally dawning, many
Israeli
politicians are openly advocating a new "Transfer Option", writes Ilan Pappe*
As a Jewish child, born in Haifa in the early 1950s, I did not encounter the term Nakbah (catastrophe), nor was I aware of its significance. Only in my high- school days did the term make its first appearance. There were three
Israeli
Palestinian pupils in my class, and we all participated in joint and guided tours around Haifa and in its vicinity. In those days, there was still evidence of Arab Haifa in the Old City: beautiful buildings, remnants of a covered market later destroyed by the
Israelis
in 1948, mosques and churches.
These relics testified to the city's more glorious past. Many of these residues of the past are gone now, demolished by the bulldozers of an ambitious city mayor who has erased any urban characteristics that could point to the city's Arab past. But in those days there were quite a few Arab houses squeezed between the modern concrete buildings. The guides on the school tours used to refer to them as Hirbet Al-Shaych, a vague reference to an Arab house from an unidentified period. My Palestinian classmates muttered that these were houses left from the 1948 Nakbah, but they did not dare to challenge their teachers, nor did they expand on what they meant.
Later, as a young doctoral student at Oxford University I chose 1948 as the subject of my thesis. I wrote on British policy in that year, but incidentally discovered evidence in the
Israeli
and British archives that, when put together, gave me for the first time a clear idea of what the Nakbah had been about. I found strong proof for the systematic expulsion of the Palestinians from Palestine, and I was taken aback by the speed at which the judaisation of the formerly Palestinian villages and neighbourhoods was carried out.
These villages, from which the Palestinian population had been evicted in 1948, were renamed and resettled within a matter of months. This picture contrasted sharply not only with what I had learned at school about 1948, but also with what I had gathered as a BA student in Middle Eastern Studies at the Hebrew University in
Jerusalem
, even though quite a few of my courses dealt with the history of
Israel
. Needless to say, what I found also contradicted the messages conveyed to me as a citizen of
Israel
during my initiation in the army, at public events such as Independence Day, and in daily discourse in the country's media on the history of the
Israeli
-Palestinian conflict.
When I returned home to
Israel
in 1984 to begin an academic career, I discovered the phenomenon of Nakbah denial in my new environment. It was in fact part of a larger phenomenon -- that of excluding the Palestinians altogether from local academic discourse. This was particularly evident, and bewildering, in the field of Middle Eastern Studies in which I had commenced my career as a lecturer. Towards the end of the 1980s, as a result of the first Intifada, the situation improved somewhat, with the Palestinians being introduced into Middle Eastern Studies as legitimate subject matter. But even then this was done mainly through the eyes of academics who had been Intelligence experts on the subject in the past, and who still had close ties with the security services and the IDF [
Israeli
Defence Force]. Thus, this
Israeli
academic perspective erased the Nakbah as a historical event, preventing local scholars and academics from challenging the overall denial and suppression of the catastrophe in the world outside the universities' ivory towers.
For a short while at the end of the 1980s, several academics, including myself, caught public attention by publishing scholarly books that challenged the accepted
Israeli
version of the 1948 War. In these books, we accused
Israel
of expelling the indigenous population and of destroying the Palestinian villages and neighbourhoods. Although our early works were hesitant and cautious, and mine were not even translated into Hebrew, it was still possible to gather from them that the Jewish State was built on the ruins of the indigenous people of Palestine, whose livelihood, houses, culture and land had been systematically destroyed.
Public response in
Israel
at the time moved between indifference to the total rejection of our findings. Only in the media and through the educational system did we succeed in directing people towards taking a new look at the past. However, from above, the establishment did everything it could to quash these early buds of
Israeli
self-awareness and recognition of
Israel
's role in the Palestinian catastrophe, a recognition that would have helped
Israelis
to understand better the present deadlock in the peace process.
The struggle against the denial of the Nakbah in
Israel
then shifted to the Palestinian political scene in the country. Since the 40th anniversary of the Nakbah in 1988, the Palestinian minority in
Israel
has associated, in a way that it never did previously, its collective and individual memories of the catastrophe with the general Palestinian situation and with their predicament in particular. This association has been manifested through an array of symbolic gestures, such as memorial services during Nakbah commemoration day, organised tours to deserted or formerly Palestinian villages in
Israel
, seminars on the past, and extensive interviews with Nakbah survivors in the press.
Through its political leaders, NGOs and media, the Palestinian minority in
Israel
has been able to force the wider public to take notice of the Nakbah. This re-emergence of the Nakbah as a topic for public debate was also helped by the climax of the
Oslo
negotiations -- the Camp David summit meeting between the then Prime Minister of
Israel
Ehud Barak and Arafat in the summer of 2000. The false impression at the time, which had it that the end of the conflict was about to be achieved, placed the Nakbah and
Israel
's responsibility for it at the top of the Palestinian list of demands. And, despite the collapse of the summit meeting, mainly due to an
Israeli
wish to enforce its point of view on the Palestinian side, for a while the catastrophe of 1948 was brought to the attention of a local, regional, and to certain extent global, audience.
Not only in
Israel
, but also in the
United States
, and even in Europe, it was necessary to remind those concerned with the Palestine question that this conflict did not only entail the future of the occupied territories, but also that of the Palestinian refugees who had been forced from their homes in 1948. The
Israelis
had earlier succeeded in sidelining the issue of the refugees' rights from the
Oslo
Accords, an aim helped by ill-managed Palestinian diplomacy and strategy.
Indeed, the Nakbah had been so efficiently kept off the agenda of the peace process that when it suddenly appeared on it, the
Israelis
felt as if a Pandora's box had been prised open in front of them. The worst fear of the
Israeli
negotiators was that there was a possibility that
Israel
's responsibility for the 1948 catastrophe would now become a negotiable issue, and this "danger" was, accordingly, immediately confronted. In the
Israeli
media and parliament, the Knesset, a consensual position was formulated: no
Israeli
negotiator would be allowed even to discuss the Right of Return of the Palestinian refugees to the homes they had occupied before 1948. The Knesset passed a law to this effect, and Barak made a public commitment to it on the stairs of the plane that was taking him to Camp David.
The media and other cultural institutions were also recruited to discourage discussion of the Nakbah and its relevance to the peace process, and it was in this atmosphere that I became involved in the Tantura Affair. This erupted after an MA student at my university, Haifa, exposed an hitherto unknown massacre, one of the largest yet known, carried out during the 1948 War by
Israeli
forces in the Palestinian village of Tantura. This student was taken to court in December 2000 accused of defamation, and later, in November 2001, he was expelled from the university for daring to add yet further evidence of
Israel
's responsibly for the Palestinian catastrophe. The court system, it transpired, thus willingly joined the denial process.
This year, as I look back over the attempts that I have made, together with those of others, to introduce the Nakbah onto the
Israeli
public agenda, what emerges is a very mixed picture. I can now detect cracks in the wall of denial and repression that surrounds the Nakbah in
Israel
, coming about as a result of the debate on the "new history" in
Israel
and the new political agenda of the Palestinians in
Israel
. The new atmosphere has also been helped by a clarification of the Palestinian position on the refugees issue towards the end of the
Oslo
Peace Process. As a result, now, in mid-2002, it is, after more than 50 years of repression, more difficult in
Israel
to deny the expulsion and destruction of the Palestinians in 1948. However, this relative success has also brought with it two negative reactions, formulated after the outbreak of the Al-Aqsa Intifada.
The first reaction has been from the
Israeli
political establishment, with the Sharon government, through its minister of education, beginning the systematic removal of any textbook or school syllabus that refers to the Nakbah, even marginally. Similar instructions have been given to the public broadcasting authorities. The second reaction has been even more disturbing and has encompassed wider sections of the public. Although a very considerable number of
Israeli
politicians, journalists and academics have ceased to deny what happened in 1948, they have nonetheless also been willing to justify it publicly, not only in retrospect but also as a prescription for the future. The idea of "transfer" has entered
Israeli
political discourse openly for the first time, gaining legitimacy as the best means of dealing with the Palestinian "problem".
Indeed, if I were asked to choose what best characterises the current
Israeli
response to the Nakbah, I would stress the growing popularity of the Transfer Option in
Israeli
public mood and thought. The Nakbah -- the expulsion of the Palestinians from Palestine -- now seems to many in the centre of the political map as an inevitable and justifiable consequence of the Zionist project in Palestine. If there is any lament, it is that the expulsion was not completed. The fact that even an
Israeli
"new historian" such as Benny Morris now subscribes to the view that the expulsion was inevitable and should have been more comprehensive helps to legitimise future
Israeli
plans for further ethnic cleansing.
Transfer is now the official, moral option recommended by one of
Israel
's most prestigious academic centres, the Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies in Herzeliya, which advises the government. It has appeared as a policy proposal in papers presented by senior Labour Party ministers to their government. It is openly advocated by university professors, media commentators, and very few now dare to condemn it. And, lately, the leader of the Majority in the American House of Representatives has openly endorsed it.
A circle has thus been closed. When
Israel
took over almost 80 per cent of Palestine in 1948, it did so through settlement and ethnic cleansing of the original Palestinian population. The country now has a prime minister who enjoys wide public support, and who wants to determine by force the future of the remaining 20 per cent. He has, as did all his predecessors, from Labour and Likud alike, resorted to settlement as the best means for doing this, adding the destruction of independent Palestinian infrastructure. He senses, and he may not be wrong in this, that the public mood in
Israel
would allow him to go even further, should he wish to repeat the ethnic cleansing not only of the Palestinians in the occupied territories, but if necessary also that of the one million Palestinians living within the pre-1967
Israeli
borders.
The Nakbah thus is no longer denied in
Israel
; on the contrary, it is cherished. However, the full story remains to be told to the
Israelis
, as there may still be some among that state's population who are sensitive about their country's past and present conduct. This segment of the population should be alerted to the fact that horrific deeds were concealed from them about
Israeli
actions in 1948, and they should be told, too, that such deeds could easily now be repeated, if they, and others, do not act to stop them before it is too late.
* The writer is a professor of political science at Haifa University and a notable member of
Israel
's New Historians.
Note from the editor
As Dr Ilan Pappe notes in his article, written for Al-Ahram Weekly on the occasion of the anniversary of the Nakbah, an MA student at Haifa University in
Israel
was expelled from the university in November 2001 for exposing a hitherto- unknown
Israeli
massacre carried out against the Palestinian residents of the village of Tantura during the 1948 War.
Now it is Dr Pappe's turn to be expelled, as the
Israeli
authorities crack down on freedom of speech, threatening academic freedom within the country's universities.
In a letter circulated last week, Pappe writes that the Dean of the Humanities Department of Haifa University has demanded his expulsion from the university as a result of the strong stand he took in support of the student and of academic freedom.
"Judging by the way things have been done in the past," Pappe writes, "the verdict has already been decided ... A fair trial does not exist, and hence I do not even intend to appeal against this McCarthite charade."
Dr Pappe, who holds a doctorate in history from Oxford University and is one of Haifa University's best-known and most-respected historians, appeals in his letter to the international academic community "not to prevent my expulsion, since
Israeli
academia has decided to support the government and help silence any criticism."
Rather, he calls upon universities worldwide to debate a boycott of
Israeli
institutions, given their contempt for basic principles of academic freedom and for dispassionate research.
"Many of you have access to the world's media," he writes in his letter, calling upon researchers and scholars everywhere to help "expose the already dismal picture and false pretence of
Israel
being the "only democracy in the Middle East."
Recommend this page
© Copyright Al-Ahram Weekly. All rights reserved
Send a letter to the Editor
Clic
here
to read the story from its source.
Related stories
Catastrophe without end
Resisting the Nakba
Oslo and the end of Palestinian independence
The Phantom Middle East Peace Process
Palestine's right to statehood and what it means
Report inappropriate advertisement