Egypt's anti-drug body launches new awareness phase in Maspero Triangle    Agiba Petroleum starts production from Arcadia-28 at 4,100 BOE/day    Minister El-Shimy pushes for stronger returns, partnerships in real estate, construction sectors    Apparel, textile chambers engage with Chinese delegation to explore investment opportunities in Egypt    Egypt reviews health insurance funding mechanism to ensure long-term sustainability    Obama calls for aid access to Gaza, says 'no justification' for withholding food    Gaza on verge of famine as war escalates, ceasefire talks stall    Gaza crisis, trade on agenda as Trump hosts Starmer in Scotland    Egyptian president follows up on initiatives to counter extremist thought    Egypt's SCZONE eyes deeper investment, port digitalisation ties with Singapore    Egypt's gold prices slip slightly on July 28th    Egypt's Housing Min. reviews HDP marketing plan    Indian Embassy to launch cultural festival in Assiut, film fest in Cairo    Egyptian aid convoy heads toward Gaza as humanitarian crisis deepens    Culture minister launches national plan to revive film industry, modernise cinematic assets    Sudan's ambassador to Egypt holds reconstruction talks on with Arab League    I won't trade my identity to please market: Douzi    Egypt welcomes 25-nation statement urging end to Gaza war    Sisi sends letter to Nigerian president affirming strategic ties    Egypt, Senegal sign pharma MoU to unify regulatory standards    Two militants killed in foiled plot to revive 'Hasm' operations: Interior ministry    Egypt, Somalia discuss closer environmental cooperation    Egypt foils terrorist plot, kills two militants linked to Hasm group    Egypt's EHA, Huawei discuss enhanced digital health    Foreign, housing ministers discuss Egypt's role in African development push    Egypt reveals heritage e-training portal    Three ancient rock-cut tombs discovered in Aswan    Sisi launches new support initiative for families of war, terrorism victims    Egypt expands e-ticketing to 110 heritage sites, adds self-service kiosks at Saqqara    Egypt's Irrigation Minister urges scientific cooperation to tackle water scarcity    Palm Hills Squash Open debuts with 48 international stars, $250,000 prize pool    On Sport to broadcast Pan Arab Golf Championship for Juniors and Ladies in Egypt    Golf Festival in Cairo to mark Arab Golf Federation's 50th anniversary    Germany among EU's priciest labour markets – official data    Paris Olympic gold '24 medals hit record value    A minute of silence for Egyptian sports    Russia says it's in sync with US, China, Pakistan on Taliban    It's a bit frustrating to draw at home: Real Madrid keeper after Villarreal game    Shoukry reviews with Guterres Egypt's efforts to achieve SDGs, promote human rights    Sudan says countries must cooperate on vaccines    Johnson & Johnson: Second shot boosts antibodies and protection against COVID-19    Egypt to tax bloggers, YouTubers    Egypt's FM asserts importance of stability in Libya, holding elections as scheduled    We mustn't lose touch: Muller after Bayern win in Bundesliga    Egypt records 36 new deaths from Covid-19, highest since mid June    Egypt sells $3 bln US-dollar dominated eurobonds    Gamal Hanafy's ceramic exhibition at Gezira Arts Centre is a must go    Italian Institute Director Davide Scalmani presents activities of the Cairo Institute for ITALIANA.IT platform    







Thank you for reporting!
This image will be automatically disabled when it gets reported by several people.



ECJ judgment: Is CRISPR-Cas9 "genetic engineering" at all?
Published in Daily News Egypt on 24 - 07 - 2018

On Wednesday, the European Court of Justice will decide whether CRISPR-Cas9 is really “genetic engineering”. In that case, food cultivated with it would have to be labelled accordingly. What is the verdict about?To laymen, the topic which judges of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) will have to assess on Wednesday in Luxembourg sounds academic: Is the CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology, also known as “enzyme scissors”, to be classified as “genetic engineering” or not?
Even among experts, the debate has caused some frowning: Hadn't both researchers and the media alike celebrated the discovery of the CRISPR-Cas9 mechanism by molecular biologists Emanuelle Charpentier and Jennifer Doudna in 2011 as a decisive breakthrough in genetic engineering?
However, it's not that simple: The issue that the court has to decide upon is anything but academic. Above all, it has a very direct effect on all of us: What kind of food will we eat in the future? And will we know what we are eating?
Previous EU directive is outdated
So far, according to European law, CRISPR-Cas9 is not formally considered genetic engineering. This is because the EU directive for genetically modified organisms was issued before the CRISPR-Cas9 mechanism was discovered. Only traditional genetic engineering methods in the field of cultivation and breeding are included, but not the enzyme scissors.
With conventional genetic engineering methods, individual genes with certain properties are introduced into the genome of other organisms. This can, for example, be achieved by using transport viruses, a complicated and lengthy process.
CRISPR-Cas9, on the other hand, allows researchers to precisely cut out individual gene segments from the genome and replace them with other segments. It is therefore possible to breed mutants that have desired properties. However, they do not require the genetic material of other organisms. Additionally, unlike other genetic engineering methods, it is almost impossible to subsequently prove the use of CRISPR-Cas9 in the genome. The mutations are indistinguishable from naturally ocurring changes.
Pros and cons
Biomedicine, plant breeders and molecular biologists have high hopes for the CRISPR-Cas9 technology because the desired varieties can be developed much faster and are less risky than with conventional genetic engineering methods. This could lead to plant varieties that are resistant to certain parasites or produce good yields even under complex climatic conditions.
The advocates of CRISPR-Cas9 fear that the inclusion of gene editing into the relevant EU directive would put the brakes on research and breeding, as products cultivated with the help of CRISPR-Cas9 could no longer be marketed as “GM-free”.
Furthermore, there is a danger that promising research projects could no longer take place because many donors and universities prohibit research with and on genetically modified organisms. This would put European research at a disadvantage, the advocates of the method say.
Environmentalists, organic farmers and opponents of genetic engineering who started the lawsuit against CRISPR-Cas9, argue that the risks of genetic editing can not yet be assessed.
Just recently, studies have shown that undesirable mutations can also occur when the technology is used. Especially in areas of genetic material that are far removed from the actual target region of the gene editing technique.
The opponents of gene editing therefore argue that a labelling obligation in the sense of consumer protection is necessary. Customers would have to decide for themselves whether they want to buy genetically modified products or not.


Clic here to read the story from its source.