Egypt cabinet's operations room following up on voting in constitutional referendum    Moody's upgrades Egypt's ratings to B2    Cardiff's Warnock hopes to avoid thrashing by Liverpool    Four Turkish soldiers killed in clashes with PKK: Ministry    Tennis: Barty beats doubles partner Azarenka to level Fed Cup semi-final    New attack on Ebola center in Congo; 1 militia member killed    Sleep myths may hinder good sleep and health    Russian envoys meet Syria's Assad, discuss post-war efforts, trade    Northern Ireland police arrest two over murder of journalist    Egyptians begin voting on constitutional amendments referendum in Egypt    Neymar could be back on Sunday, says PSG coach    Egypt's economy: Reining in inflation    Mauro Colombo's Tierra Adentro wins Yellow Robin award    Cannes prepares 60th anniversary of Marché du Film    Egyptians abroad vote in constitution referendum    No days off during constitutional amendments referendum: Cabinet    Egyptian community in US will be voting "yes" on constitutional amendments    Investing in people helps to share in benefits of economic growth, technological progress    Trump forces Brussels' hand on trade despite tariffs backlash    Uber adds new feature for female drivers to drive only women in Saudi Arabia    Two Egyptian females win 2019 Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting    Beyond chocolate: The egg in art and design    Tobruk Parliament calls on UN Security Council to stop Qatari, Turkish intervention    For its 10th time: L'Oréal Group recognised as one of world's most ethical companies    Made in Germany, heard in Spain: The Leon cathedral organ connection    Moody's upgrades Egypt's rating to B2, expects more economic growth    Expected exit    Spectacular scene, favourable draw    Reining in inflation    The economic way ahead    Sudanese demand ‘legitimate change'    Caught in the middle?    What next for Libya?    Escaping expenses    ‘I don't want sympathy'    Pasta vegetable salad    Towards the referendum    The final draft    Flight prices go sky high    Bundeli Kala Parishad troupe's Indian folk dance show at Al-Gumhouriya Theatre is a must go    Paris' Notre Dame    Screen blues    Parliament approves constitutional amendments allowing Al-Sisi extra term till 2030    Vatican willing to offer technical know-how to help restore Notre-Dame    Al-Azhar condemns racist chants against Liverpool's Mohamed Salah    Mentally frail Borussia Dortmund relying on individual brilliance    German Football Ambassador 2019: Klopp, Kroos, Podolski on the list    In the company of the philosopher Roshdi Rashed in Paris    

Thank you for reporting!
This image will be automatically disabled when it gets reported by several people.

Iran showdown in Congress damages US credibility
Published in Daily News Egypt on 03 - 09 - 2015

The White House has secured enough support in the Senate to successfully veto a resolution that would "disapprove" of the Iran nuclear deal. But it is a hollow victory, as a presidential veto could damage US credibility.
The votes have been tallied. At least 34 US Senators will support the Iran nuclear deal, and back President Barack Obama's anticipated veto of a resolution that disapproves of the agreement. To put it simply, those in Congress who oppose the nuclear deal have been defeated – for now.
There's a good chance that Congress will pass the disapproval resolution. After all, both the House of Representatives and the Senate are controlled by the Republican Party, which is bitterly opposed to the nuclear agreement. At least two leading Democrats, Senators Robert Menendez and Charles Schumer, are also opposed. They have until 17 September to vote on the resolution.
Should the disapproval resolution pass, President Obama would issue a veto. In order to override a presidential veto, opponents of the deal would then need two-thirds support in the House and the Senate. Senator Barbara Mikulski's decision on Wednesday to support the nuclear agreement ensures that opponents will not have the 67 votes needed in the Senate to override the president's veto.
According to Jeffrey Peake, many opponents of the Iran nuclear deal knew from the beginning that they would probably lose the showdown with the president. But the impending vote gives them the opportunity to state their opposition to the historic agreement on the record.
"They knew the writing was on the wall," Peake, an expert on the role of Congress in American diplomacy, told DW. "It was pretty to clear to everyone involved that the veto would be sustained."
"It allows them a vote where they can go home to their constituents and say, ‘I voted to oppose this deal. It's on the record,'" Peake said. "They have capitulated basically, but it's so convoluted and complicated that most observers and constituents aren't going to see that."
US sanctions
The process always weighed heavily in President Obama's favour. He needed to rally just one-third of the Senate to guarantee the resolution's ultimate demise. But he did run a political risk, however small.
Americans are deeply divided over the Iran deal, and supporters of Israel have been lobbying hard against it. Republicans hoped to leverage this sentiment to flip more Democrats like Menendez and Schumer. Had President Obama failed to gather the support needed to sustain his veto, the Republican-controlled Congress would have passed the disapproval resolution.
According to Peake, some US sanctions against Iran would have probably remained in place as a consequence. These sanctions would have hit not just Iran, but probably Washington's European allies as well, who have been moving to invest there.
"The United States would then be compelled – at least by law, the president would ignore this I'm sure – to sanction the states that are now trading with Iran and that would be our allies," Peake said.
"It wouldn't just be a loss of US credibility, it would be a serious diplomatic problem, an economic trade issue with our European partners," he continued. "That would create a schism in our relationship not just with Russia, but also with Germany and France and Great Britain."
Banks uncertain
Some European banks are observing the confrontation between the president and Congress with concern, according to Christopher Bidwell, an expert on non-proliferation at the Federation of American Scientists.
European banks have been burned by US sanctions before. Authorities fined France's BNP $10bn (€8.9bn), and banned the bank from conducting some transactions in dollars for a year because it had violated US sanctions against Iran, Cuba and Sudan.
With this episode in mind, some banks might not be willing to do business with Iran even if President Obama successfully vetoes the congressional resolution. A veto would suggest that the Iran deal does not enjoy strong bipartisan support in the US. The presidential election is just around the corner, and the Republican candidates oppose sanctions relief.
"They may not be willing to rush into the Iranian market so fast," Bidwell told DW. "That's the impact this debate between Congress and the president has. Just because the sanctions are temporarily waived doesn't mean the risk is off."
Move to filibuster
If the sanctions are in fact lifted but the banks are simply unwilling to do business with Iran due to the political risk, Tehran might accuse the US of not holding up its end of the bargain, Bidwell said.
President Obama and his Senate allies hope to avoid the negative political fallout from a veto. They are now moving to filibuster the disapproval resolution, which would prevent it from being brought to a vote altogether. Such a move would require 41 votes.
"If they successfully filibuster it, Congress won't be on the record as diametrically opposing the president's foreign policy," Peake said. "If the Democrats can filibuster it, the president doesn't lose an embarrassing vote that might hurt our credibility internationally."

Clic here to read the story from its source.